Referee. Said no goal.... So it was not a goal.
Wtf are you on about.
It was a goal, we got away with it.
Next you'll be saying the earth is flat.
Look at it from the CORRECT angle for these decisions - from the side or above. Wanna bet your life that the whole of the ball is over the line?
There's a chunk of the ball that's overlapped by the post. I've said on here one of my pet hates is people not getting this rule several times. Sky comms were woeful too not seeing that. If u do a refs course they'll show u a pic like bozzas first one then show u an in line shot - which proves no goal - as above
At what point is that photo taken? The same as the front-on shot or slightly later? Or earlier?
From the side or above is bull, as the cross bar makes it look like it isn't when in actual fact it is.
Speaking sense, but few, not even SKY shamefully, can see this.
Wow. Just wow. I've lost IQ points reading that. You owe me some IQ points. Just pop them in the post, there's a good chap.
Well yes I am aware of the match facts thanks. The question is in debate of the decision. Christ on a bike
Yes, I can see the god damn grass in between the ball and the line.
From the side or above is bull, as the cross bar makes it look like it isn't when in actual fact it is.
You wouldn't be saying this if it was us, you are a hypocrite.
The ball clearly crossed the line. How can you lose IQ points by reading something?