Goal or no goal? You decide...

[KZNSeagull]

Definitely a goal, but Ref did not give it, so not a goal.

Oh bad luck Watford, what a shame

 

[TWOCHOICEStom]

Definitely NO GOAL

 

[Dougie]

It was a goal but luckily for you the lino was unsighted or just fecking inept !

 

[El Turi]

Definite goal but the little **** who scored it could have quite easily been sent off in the first half.

 

[Bozza]

 

[Ravids]

The sideways view suggested the whole ball had not crossed the line. I don't feel hypocritical.

It was a goal, fact.

 

[easynow]

It's hard to tell...

 

[brakespear]

goal all day long, no argument whatsoever.

 

[DJ Leon]

If the same had happened to us you'd all be saying it's a definite goal, so stop being a bunch of hypocritical *******s, it was a goal, we got away with it, let's move on.

Speak for yourself. Not sure what gives you confidence that it was a definite goal. You understand that a ball can show grass between the line and not be completely over the line?

 

[Driver8]

It's hard to tell...

It really isn't.

 

[Hyperion]

Still shots mean nothing though. The side on view Sky are showing is not exactly in line with the goal line so that's a poor angle. It's a goal, simple as that.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

It was a goal, fact.

The whole ball did not cross the line. See top photo.

 

[Sheebo]

Can I just add to the above, those pictures are taken.from a bad angle. The side-on view level the goal line doesn't show the whole ball crossing the line.

No goal. The whole ball didn't cross the line. The commentatotrs should know better and are just trying to save face.

No goal for me, evidence inconclusive, have to be 100% sure

The other shot from side on suggested the ball had not crossed the line entirely.

The sideways view suggested the whole ball had not crossed the line. I don't feel hypocritical.

Thank GOD there are some educated football fans on NSC. Every last millimetre of ball must be over WHOLE LINE and you should be able to see a perfect sphere side on. Definitely not a goal - by about 1cm

 

[DJ Leon]

It was a goal, fact.

Try and think about this. Do you think it's a definite goal because there's grass between the ball and the line?

 

[easynow]

It really isn't.

It is if your wearing dark sunglasses and squinting...

 

[portslade seagull]

It looked like a goal ... If it was one of ours NSC would be in meltdown moaning about GLT

 

[swindonseagull]

Still shots mean nothing though. The side on view Sky are showing is not exactly in line with the goal line so that's a poor angle. It's a goal, simple as that.

Referee. Said no goal.... So it was not a goal.

 

[Ravids]

Speak for yourself. Not sure what gives you confidence that it was a definite goal. You understand that a ball can show grass between the line and not be completely over the line?

Wtf are you on about.

It was a goal, we got away with it.

Next you'll be saying the earth is flat.

 

[brakespear]

Thank GOD there are some educated football fans on NSC. Every last millimetre of ball must be over WHOLE LINE and you should be able to see a perfect sphere side on. Definitely not a goal - by about 1cm

At what point is that photo taken? The same as the front-on shot or slightly later? Or earlier?

 

[hart's shirt]

Easier to give the goal than not with the distance of the majority of the ball clearly behind the line, but if the ref / assistant is any doubt, it shouldn't be given.

And happily, it wasn't.