- Jan 3, 2012
- 17,356
Crying with laughter. It's just emotional nonsense but I'll soldier through
This emotional nonsense is about AT LEAST 30,000 people having died from this disease in this country, and hundreds more dying every day.
Crying with laughter. It's just emotional nonsense but I'll soldier through
This emotional nonsense is about AT LEAST 30,000 people having died from this disease in this country, and hundreds more dying every day.
Prolonged contact? With people that will have been tested multiple times in the past few weeks? There are many people working in far far riskier situations. Here are a few. Transport workers, airport workers, doctors, police, nurses, fire service, dentists, shop workers. The list goes on and on. Footballers are at no greater risk, in fact far less than those already listed many of whom are far more vulnerable to the virus.
My point here is not that we should force football back. But if it wont come back then surely those employed within the game should do what the rest of us have had to endure, including furloughs.
Enough.
Covid 19 is much more contageous and much more deadly than flu, I get that, but given that it is likely to be around for a good while, may be forever when does the level of risk become acceptable?? Where does the balance fall between protecting people from getting it and protecting the economy which if the recession turns into a depression and millions lose their jobs will lead to many more deaths from all of the consequences fo that years down the line??
That was my point, we have to find an acceptable level of what we deem to be safe asnd that will never be nil, just as we do with the flu, we accept people die from it but we also know that if we did some of the things we do now we could supress the number of people dying from flu, if every life is ultimately so precious why don't we implement these measures? Probably because the benefits of keeping people alive and not getting flu is outwieged by the cost to the general population in enjoying their lives and the economivc cost of doing so.
Listen Mr. Thicko, I have just about had enough of the utter shite that you spout on here. All those workers you have listed above wear anything from masks, protective gloves, and a whole host of PPE to minimise personal contact with others. Footballers on the pitch have NOTHING to protect them.....all for your f*****g entertainment.
When Arteta of Aresenal was diagnosed with Coved 19 the football authorities quite rightly postponed football. That was March the 13th.
Just 7 days earlier from that decision the first person in the UK died of Coved 19 and two days later the second person died. Those infected were numbered in the low thousands.
Now, with (just those tested) there have been 233,000 positive tests of Coved 19 and an horrendous figure of 33, 614 deaths (and we all know that is understated).
And now you , you complete prick, are having a tantrum because players are rightly concerned.
Shame on you....and others.
Covid 19 is much more contageous and much more deadly than flu, I get that, but given that it is likely to be around for a good while, may be forever when does the level of risk become acceptable?? Where does the balance fall between protecting people from getting it and protecting the economy which if the recession turns into a depression and millions lose their jobs will lead to many more deaths from all of the consequences fo that years down the line??
That was my point, we have to find an acceptable level of what we deem to be safe asnd that will never be nil, just as we do with the flu, we accept people die from it but we also know that if we did some of the things we do now we could supress the number of people dying from flu, if every life is ultimately so precious why don't we implement these measures? Probably because the benefits of keeping people alive and not getting flu is outwieged by the cost to the general population in enjoying their lives and the economivc cost of doing so.
Wow. Abuse now. Nice. Thank God its not you running the country.
Wow. Abuse now. Nice. Thank God its not you running the country.
OK lets say I agree with all the sentiment but all this will be discussed between players groups, unions etc..Why are we the ones giving Talkshite and Sky Sports interviews? It makes us out to be the ones moaning and with the have most to lose as we have a points advantage.
If you take off your blue and white striped glasses it would drive you up the wall if it was another club acting this way. I'm not saying don't lobby behind the scenes or whatever but just stop sending out rubbish soundbites that can easily be used against us
I think a simple "No comment, because my words will be twisted" should now be mandatory for everyone connected to bhafc when asked about football being restarted.
I’m guessing the risk level becomes acceptable when the government lifts the 2 metre social distancing rules - until then I can’t see how you can ask or expect players to play a contact sport with close contact...
They are being asked to turn up 15 minutes before kick-off with just enough time to have a wee and put their boots on, then play 90 minutes of football and drive home within 15 minutes of the final whistle without so much as a warm shower.
This from today’s govt briefing - Re football, Prof Van Tam says easing social distancing has been “tentative” and “measured”, and this applies to all of elite sport.
First comes a return to safe training, while still observing social distancing, he says.
“We will have to see how that goes before we even think about the return of competitive football matches," he says. “We have to be slow, we have to be measured.”
I can’t see much chance of the PL being back in little over a month. Middle of July perhaps but surely that will be too late.
I’m guessing the risk level becomes acceptable when the government lifts the 2 metre social distancing rules - until then I can’t see how you can ask or expect players to play a contact sport with close contact...