sir danny cullip
New member
Jam The Man said:McGhee clearly can't win
Sorry, couldn't resist!
Jam The Man said:McGhee clearly can't win
KinkyNormanBaker said:Maybe him and Dodd like their mid morning chats in the treatment room?
555kaz said:To be fair I don't think the majority of supporters are against him, at least not going by the applause he got when he went off at Luton
Got to disagree with you there. 10/10 for effort which is why he had a good reception but he just wasn't at the races. I made a point of watching him and trolley for a while and their movement off the ball was non existant, the runs they made were poor and almost always going towards the corner flag. Admittedly they hadn't played togeather before so it's asking alot to strike up an instant understanding. CKR proved how it should be done when he came on by actually causing problems for their defence, who untill his arrival had had an easy rideRepugnant Toad said:Was actually quite impressive at Luton, if a bit naive. Would like to see him make the bench when fit.
Rougvie said:Its not Turienzo himself that a lot of people feel frustrated by, its the fact that £150K was spent on a player only seen on video and who hasnt featured in a season that was always going to be a releagation battle.
Its easy to use hindsight, but that money was a write off as far as this season is concerned, and a club like ours cannot afford to spend for the future, we have an academy for that, we have to spend for the hear and now.
Yorkie said:150K is peanuts compared to what other teams in this division are paying for their strikers. I know we can't afford 450K for the likes of Henderson (Watford) so we do take chances on other players. Some gambles pay off, ie.Currie, some don't.
Biscuit said:Remember everyone slating Butter in the first season?
GUNTER said:Who is BUTTER?
Rougvie said:Dont agree, certainly not at the start of the season, 150K in cash is still a lot of money for a bottom half CCC side.
Billy the Fish said:Got to disagree with you there. 10/10 for effort which is why he had a good reception but he just wasn't at the races. I made a point of watching him and trolley for a while and their movement off the ball was non existant, the runs they made were poor and almost always going towards the corner flag. Admittedly they hadn't played togeather before so it's asking alot to strike up an instant understanding. CKR proved how it should be done when he came on by actually causing problems for their defence, who untill his arrival had had an easy ride
Biscuit said:Remember everyone slating Butter in the first season? Well I can't imagine our defence without him now. The same could be true of Turienzo!
He is in a foreign country and he is struggling with the language and injuries. Once he's settled in he *might* be that striker were looking for!
Lets just give him chance eh lads. Not just call him 'dead wood' and try and get rid of him at the first oppertunity!
That is all.
Billy the Fish said:Got to disagree with you there. 10/10 for effort which is why he had a good reception but he just wasn't at the races. I made a point of watching him and trolley for a while and their movement off the ball was non existant, the runs they made were poor and almost always going towards the corner flag. Admittedly they hadn't played togeather before so it's asking alot to strike up an instant understanding. CKR proved how it should be done when he came on by actually causing problems for their defence, who untill his arrival had had an easy ride
Repugnant Toad said:To be fair, as a target man I thought he did a decent job - he held it up well, laid it off neatly and covered vast amounts of ground; but it's a target man needs someone to play off him, and McCammon was never going to do that. A bad pairing up-front if anything - I'd like to see him play with another player.