Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
Pretty sure if he raped a 15 year old girl he'd remember.
Not if he didn't ask her age.
Pretty sure if he raped a 15 year old girl he'd remember.
I am sure that I read that the stars of Corrie were going to gpo on strile as they are only paid if and when they appear in an episode
How does the change in the law now relate to this. As a young lad it was usual to give the girl some booze to encourage her to have sex now that is classed as rape.
Do you really want to post this on a public forum ? Think about it.
I have no issues and I certainly dont think anyone will be seeking to have me prosecuted at this distance and based on my recollection. I am not surethat typical juvenile behaviour has necessarily changed greatly but certainly attitudes have and I think there is some danger and a certain dubious morality about applying current belief sets to every historical circumstance without any reference to changed social mores.
Considering Bill has had well over 1000 sexual partners I can perfectly believe he cannot remember one from 1967.
I tend to agree with Ben I think. To bring a rape charge forward from 1967 is frankly absurd. Any rape charge will pretty much destroy a Man's life whether he is found guilty or not.
Hope not cos I couldn't begin to tell you names or occasions and if they had had a drink or not. That is me so what chance does a famous person stand of knowing of every occasion.Oh my Lord I can see prosecutions coming soon.
Lack of memory is not a defence. IMO the only thing that matters is the evidence which if available should be considered just like any other case.
So are you suggesting an amnesty? Whilst I agree that anonymity would be preferable for all parties there must be no time limit on charging a person for a serious offence.
Could it be that he thought that she enjoyed it first time and wanted more so he possibly obliged. I dont know just a possible answer.And aparantely it happened twice, so it happens once and you go back for more? And now you complain Really?
Totally agree.
There should be a time limit on sexual crimes and anything from, say 20 years ago, should be forgotten, like an amnesty.
We have people on this thread claiming to report on the effects of publicity about these charges on two named individuals. That's surely inappropriate in its own right? I wouldn't dream of commenting on behalf of either of them - even though I have met them both.
If and when the time comes, they can speak for themselves, or choose to remain silent. Who are anonymous internet users to push them into commenting? It's no excuse, in my opinion, to say "It's a matter of public debate" - since it's threads like this that have created the public debate.
Just playing devils advocate here: am I right in thinking it would have been legal for him to have sex with a 16 year old girl who was willing, but if the girl was willing and 1 day under 16, then that would have been raping a 15 year old girl?
My gut reaction and it is only a hunch is that this guy is innocent. He looks totally ruined from recent photo's of him.