User removed 4
New member
rubbish, you got caught out, and norway's oil production/reserves per capita ?Eh? Clearly it's an example of a socialist government that has worked well for the best part of 5 decades!
rubbish, you got caught out, and norway's oil production/reserves per capita ?Eh? Clearly it's an example of a socialist government that has worked well for the best part of 5 decades!
Has he explained how he will fund this? Tory councils often blather on about how their council taxes are soooo low......but forget to tell you they have cut a variety of services.
Anyone can reduce tax if they dont spend anything.
Whilst I am not totally happy with Gordon Brown I, and I think the general public, are starting to feel that he is probably best placed to guide us through these difficult times.
Isn't that just Labour and Labour supporters all over though. People say the Tories have no policies but the only policies Labour have are slagging of the Tories. I cannot believe anyone thinks we will be better off with Labour and Brown except single mothers, students, long term unemployed, families with lots of kids , asylum seekers, civial servants, consultancy firms ----------------------------
Got caught out? I genuinely don't know what you're talking about there. You seem to think that the reason that Sweden has been in a better state than we have for SIXTY years is because they weren't in world war 2. That is plainly bollocks.rubbish, you got caught out, and norway's oil production/reserves per capita ?
No. f***ing. Chance.
Hear bloody hear, im glad some peaople can see this!
We only finished paying the yanks of a couple of years agoOh I didn't realise we were paying for world war 2 sixty years later.
then why use the reference point " and the same Sweden which has enjoyed a far better standard of living than we ever have since the war " ? why not , for instance , since 1930 or 1950 ?? I know the sole reason that sweden has had a higher standard of living than us isnt solely paying for ww2, but again i'll ask the question , would'nt you agree that not taking part gave them something of a head start ?? and again i'll ask about norways oil reseves per capita ?Got caught out? I genuinely don't know what you're talking about there. You seem to think that the reason that Sweden has been in a better state than we have for SIXTY years is because they weren't in world war 2. That is plainly bollocks.
then why use the reference point " and the same Sweden which has enjoyed a far better standard of living than we ever have since the war " ? why not , for instance , since 1930 or 1950 ?? I know the sole reason that sweden has had a higher standard of living than us isnt solely paying for ww2, but again i'll ask the question , would'nt you agree that not taking part gave them something of a head start ?? and again i'll ask about norways oil reseves per capita ?
not a great place,the world is it ?Norway, Oil and gas obvioulsy assists, also a dependency on public services, partly for survival.
We have just paid off the Marshall Fund debt!
In some respects that we were generally the first to put in public services and utlities, means that they are more outmoded, more inefficient, dilapidated and of course, the post war lack of investment have meant that to restore these utilities to modern standards requires huge investment.
On the other side, the fact that we seem more willing to invest in war than protecting our young, in Trident than to our Pensioners, in roads than rail.
The nordic countries invest in the child and the old. They still believe in the cradle to grave philosophy.
Means that we pay a lot of tax for minimal visual improvements in our core services..
not a great place,the world is it ?
tuesday, im sure i will contribute to the micro economy of the reeperbahnwhen are you off to review the social state of Hamburg?
tuesday, im sure i will contribute to the micro economy of the reeperbahn
im going to wear it awayGOOD LUCK, according to the next SA President, a good wash of the old todger will sort you out!!