1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,235
Fortunately chaps I don't have any regrets. I've only shot RAW since my first digital camera in 2003, and I have something like 350,000 files, Firstly NEFs (Nikon) then CR2s (Canon) and now ARS (Sony) all 350,000 files have been converted to Adobe DNG, all the raw images are catalogued, captioned and keyworded and stored on my 8TB hard drives, all are backed up of course and easily accessed and the 8TB HD's cost me £150 eac
And how much does your camera/lenses cost?For those of you thinking should I shoot raw, here's the an image that I took today of a church ceiling. The first image is just a straight jpeg conversion from a raw file, the second image is the same raw file but with a few adjustments made in lightroom which took about 3 minutes, then converted to a jpeg. The second image has much more detail in the shadow and highlight areas, and generally looks brighter. Some of the detail will most likely have been lost if the image had been shot as a jpeg.
These are just basic edits that have been applied that you could pick up in a morning. And for those that like the technical details 5 second exposure at F16