From Google:No I'm not, I read your comment that the opposition hold all the cards, and I thought to myself that was crap, as I know the EU have a great deal to lose, as we import so much from them. Of course they import from us too, but the point is, they don't hold all the cards.
If you didn't mean that they really hold all the cards, don't blame me when I take you at your word.
hold all the cards
phrase of card
1. be in a very strong or advantageous position.
Just so that we're clear what my words mean, because you appear to be struggling with this. The EU are in a far stronger position than we are. Yes of course we import stuff from the EU, but that loss is far easier to absorb for them than the loss of the EU as a realistic trading partner for us.
"a fair deal would be good for both sides" is little more than a truism at this point. It is not in the EU's interest to make things work well for us, because they want to discourage others from leaving. And once again, IMO your rhetoric bears to relationship to the facts - a bad trade deal would be an inconvenience and troublesome to the EU. The disaster would be on the UK side.Us being worse of than the EU is still a disaster for the EU. They'd have to cut off their nose to spite their face. On the other hand, a fair deal would be good for both sides.
What is a fair deal though? How many billions do you think the divorce settlement should be for it to be considered fair? What about trade tariffs? It's going to worse than having no tariffs at all, that's for sure.I don't accept what you think are bare facts. I don't think we can screw the EU over, but I think we can offer a fair deal, and it would be unwise for the EU to reject it.