Zz.. who cares. They said David Cameron would still be PM, he was still PM.No it didn't, it was suggesting no winner. What it got right was that the tories would have most seats.
Zz.. who cares. They said David Cameron would still be PM, he was still PM.No it didn't, it was suggesting no winner. What it got right was that the tories would have most seats.
Amber Rudd is most adroit at offshore tax efficiency schemes too - https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/03655247/officers
I'm no fan of offshore tax vehicles but your link says she was a director for one year, around 2000 then resigned.
Amber Rudd is most adroit at offshore tax efficiency schemes too - https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/03655247/officers
I knew an example would be brought up to say "well what about so and so". I think you will find that many politicians from both the main parties are not squeaky clean, this story happened to be about celebs.
I knew an example would be brought up to say "well what about so and so". I think you will find that many politicians from both the main parties are not squeaky clean, this story happened to be about celebs.
What is your point? That evading tax in the past doesn't count?
That has been posted in the ELECTION thread.
No, that is not my point. Perhaps she changed her mind about the scheme and should be respected for so doing. It's difficult to tell without more information. I just prefer to think about the issues of this election rather than let either side drag us into the type of smear campaigns that marred the recent US election. The Mail did it yesterday with misrepresentation of Labour's immigration policy which I called out. Equally I am calling out a smear on Amber Rudd based on very few actual facts.
I'm no fan of offshore tax vehicles but your link says she was a director for one year, around 2000 then resigned.
Boy George is absolutely loving this
[tweet]870236254377562112[/tweet]
Boy George is absolutely loving this
[tweet]870236254377562112[/tweet]
So tax breaks for the film industry were intended to encourage investment. As with any scheme this then spawns an associated industry of investment brokers etc.
Then some people invested some money via one of these companies.
Those people are then deemed as pariahs when it turns out the company they invested is ruled against by a tax tribunal.
Boy George is absolutely loving this
[tweet]870236254377562112[/tweet]
Same for Theresa May then, iirc last nights debate correctly.And I'll continue banging it until a Mod asks me not to if that's okay with you. I kind of think it's important. If you don't want me posting then one way is not to engage me in conversation.
The company itself didn't last too long either. She resigned when it was wound up with over £1Million of losses. It didn't seem to do a lot as a company either. Most strange.
She was also a director at Advanced Asset Allocation Fund and Advanced Asset Allocation Management - both Bahamas based and specialising in offshore 'investments'. She's never clarified the UK tax position of the 2 companies and whether she invested in them herself - it's rude to talk about money I suppose.
I see her late Father, who sadly passed away this week, was disqualified from being a UK company director too - misuse of company assets for personal gain.