seagullsovergrimsby
#cpfctinpotclub
ONS figures showing 697,000 on zero hours contracts roughly 10% more than the guesstimate in the article. So FACTCHECK has FACTS that are exactly like all the other FACTS on North Stand Chat - FACT
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
General Election 2015
- Thread starter Herr Tubthumper
- Start date
ONS figures showing 697,000 on zero hours contracts roughly 10% more than the guesstimate in the article. So FACTCHECK has FACTS that are exactly like all the other FACTS on North Stand Chat - FACT
Moshe Gariani
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2005
- 12,199
Two jobs or one?
Yes or no?
Yes or no?
Machiavelli
Well-known member
Oh. Guilty on that one. Please note that the explanation for this is that I too was priced out of my home city.
albion1972
Banned
- Dec 14, 2014
- 523
the worst pollester asking the wrong questions backed by labour supporting mirror.
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
I say, what an exceptional display of understatement and civility! I do admire your control.
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
If you believe anything he writes then you're a bigger *rseh*le than him.
Vegas Seagull
New member
- Jul 10, 2009
- 7,782
Don't get me wrong I like Liverpool, I go there once a year to visit my hubcaps
Vegas Seagull
New member
- Jul 10, 2009
- 7,782
The 3 pollsters that have Labour in the lead have not been tested in the General Election, the 3 that have the Tories in the lead were all in place for 2010 (test, learn, enhance etc etc)
User removed 4
New member
I hope you're right about the Tory lead, that aside, using frank carsonesque style jokes this old,and your general demeanour only confirms my view, that you're a val doonican style cardigan wearing cock of quite simply EPIC proportions, and don't even bother with the financial willy waving, I guarantee you'll come unstuck.
Camicus
New member
I endorse the above post.
- Thread starter
- #1,811
Labour edges ahead in election outcome predictor.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f83e57e8-bddf-11e4-8cf3-00144feab7de.html#axzz3T2qxg0aj
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f83e57e8-bddf-11e4-8cf3-00144feab7de.html#axzz3T2qxg0aj
- Thread starter
- #1,812
Care to explain this a bit? You're alluding to using previous data to adjust current surveys but given the political landscape is vastly different to 2010 I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
I see they are now planning to Rob Peter to pay for Paul ... so typical of Labour nothing ever changes
Machiavelli
Well-known member
As opposed to the Tories, remarkably adept at robbing the poor to line the pockets of the rich.
This time Labour seem to be doing exactly that... they are saving the people who can afford to pay back their loans £9000... aren't they the high earners?? For those lower earners that can't afford to pay back their loans, it makes no difference at all. Weird.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Taking the money needed out of peoples pension pots ..... nice
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
God help us all, who are these people voting for labour? Probably a good idea to open the borders when they did because they had to get the support from somewhere.
Surely peoples memories are not that short.
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
L
When I think about the labour party I think about uncontrolled borders all over again.
When I think about the labour party I think about uncontrolled borders all over again.
Yep, amongst other cock ups......they certainly are gold aren't they.