Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

General Election 2015







Hampster Gull

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2010
13,465
I wasn't aware of this. But I believe Tubby-MacFat is aiming his post at Labour lefties and socialists like me as opposed to Greens.

It is a small hop skip and jump from the 50% promised already to the 60% to keep the more left wing parties happy to the 80% they had when they left the UK crippled in 1979.
 


glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne


Hampster Gull

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2010
13,465
were you going to provide some evidence directly against the theory, or rely on indirect commentry from a different issue? trickle down doesnt bring wealth equality and has never pretended to. its about improving the whole economy.

One party focuses on incentivisation, the other penalisation. I know which I think is more inherently sensible.
 


glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne
It is a small hop skip and jump from the 50% promised already to the 60% to keep the more left wing parties happy to the 80% they had when they left the UK crippled in 1979.

I know lets take everything off them and then we can all use the food banks
 




melias shoes

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2010
4,830
this would of coarse solve our problem 2.5m super rich paying 50% tax and we could send 2.5m of our poor to France
NHS paid for
no food banks
no holes in the roads
no scum ripping the social off
I am sure if the tories put that in the English manifesto:lolol: they would get a great majority

I didn't say there were 2.5m over here now did I. Over 2m have left France. A percentage of them are in London and spread around Europe.
 








Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,693
The Fatherland




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,693
The Fatherland
It is a small hop skip and jump from the 50% promised already to the 60% to keep the more left wing parties happy to the 80% they had when they left the UK crippled in 1979.

I leave someone else to comment on how weak this argument is.
 






glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne
There we go. Make the pips squeak and all will be fine, we will life in a utopia. It has worked in the USSR, in North Korea.

was tongue in cheek
talking of making the pips squeak thats George oops sorry Gideons job, now he would fit in well in North Korea apart from the fact he has a permanant smirk
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,693
The Fatherland




Hampster Gull

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2010
13,465
No, not at all. I wasn't sure if you were being serious or not.

Can't see it happening any time soon but it has happened before under Labour so its not inconceivable. I don't think the two Eds are that stupid though. However read an interesting Guardian article titled "why the 1% should pay tax at 80%" which said its the job of economists to make the top rate tax level of 80% at least thinkable again.
 


melias shoes

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2010
4,830
???? You said due to tax. This article simply states in total over 2 million French people now live abroad. No reasons are given. It also states there is a steady rate of 2% leaving so this 2 million has been accumulated over some time. And the article also states the numbers leaving are "across all sections of society".

In summary, your original assertion is nonsense.

http://metro.co.uk/2014/10/11/au-re...e-abroad-with-most-heading-to-london-4901461/
Another view on it. The last paragraph gives you a clue.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,693
The Fatherland

Firstly, this is the same article...the Metro have cribbed it from the Independent. It's almost word for word identical.

Second, "scores" is not 2.5 million; it's nowhere near. Seems to me you made a flippant comment.

That said, if it is the case that a 75% tax rate only results in a few scores of people leaving, we will have absolutely nothing to worry about if we stick a few extra %s on the UK's top rate.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,693
The Fatherland
Some interesting comments about taxing the wealthy. No doubt I will get shot down but as someone who is comfortably within the top 1% of earners (& yes I have worked my socks off to get there) & an IFA to a number of very wealthy clients re their finances, it is largely an irrelevance as to what the highest rate of income tax is. Most high earners earning above £150,000 pa are not employees but run their own businesses, self employed, or Directors of companies. There are many legal ways of extracting revenue from businesses, without getting political but brought about by the former Labour Party. Paying large amounts of income tax is largely voluntary as is inheritance tax.

Out of interest what is the 1% threshold?
 






Seagull on the wing

New member
Sep 22, 2010
7,458
Hailsham
Firstly, this is the same article...the Metro have cribbed it from the Independent. It's almost word for word identical.

Second, "scores" is not 2.5 million; it's nowhere near. Seems to me you made a flippant comment.

That said, if it is the case that a 75% tax rate only results in a few scores of people leaving, we will have absolutely nothing to worry about if we stick a few extra %s on the UK's top rate.
It is thousands...that's socialism for you French style...which is Milibands goal...
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here