- Thread starter
- #4,621
Maybe If Clegg is unseated. He has said yday that any party that comes 2nd but forms a government would lack legitimacy.
I'm not sure I totally agree with this.
Maybe If Clegg is unseated. He has said yday that any party that comes 2nd but forms a government would lack legitimacy.
I'm not sure I totally agree with this.
I agree. If a higher majority of the electorate vote for left wing parties but the vote is split over several different parties but a small percentage vote for only a couple of right wing parties but the bigger of the two has slighlty more seats than the largest of the left wing parties then surely the legitimate government is the one with the lions share of the vote, ie the left wing. The problem with Clegg is that he is far more a tory than he will ever be a socialist so that comes out in his comments.
As I have said a few times now, Germany operates successfully, in fact very successfully, with a coalition and has done so for decades. I see none of the concerns or worries which people in the UK are expressing.
Just when things can't get any worse today I get the local Tory candidate knocking on my front door
"Sorry mate i dont do record jobs, poor paying less tax or responsible government, i'm a high tax, high debt, Ed Balls economics for idiots sort of a guy"
Just when things can't get any worse today I get the local Tory candidate knocking on my front door
One bright spot tonight [MENTION=409]Herr Tubthumper[/MENTION]
Latest YouGov poll (24 - 25 Apr):
LAB - 34% (-1)
CON - 32% (-1)
UKIP - 14% (+1)
LDEM - 9% (+1)
GRN - 6% (-)
That said all these 1-2% polls are within 3% margin of error... So it's still as clear as mud.
I hate deluded fools on my doorstep
Go back inside then , you'll catch your death.
One bright spot tonight [MENTION=409]Herr Tubthumper[/MENTION]
Latest YouGov poll (24 - 25 Apr):
LAB - 34% (-1)
CON - 32% (-1)
UKIP - 14% (+1)
LDEM - 9% (+1)
GRN - 6% (-)
from BBC:
Sir Charles Dunstone, the chairman of Carphone Warehouse and a former supporter of new Labour, suggested that an Ed Miliband victory would put the UK's economic recovery under threat.
he said: "I really felt I had to speak out as our economic recovery truly hangs in the balance.
"For me the choice is clear. And it is not a choice between backing business on the one hand and promoting fairness on the other. There is nothing progressive about attacking business and undermining our economy.
"If the economy fails, frankly it is not the richest who suffer, it's the poorest.
"It would be a huge and tragic irony if well-meaning people ended up hurting the most deprived in our country. But that is what I fear would happen with a Labour-SNP government - one that is anti-business, anti-aspiration and pro-spending money we haven't even earned yet."
When a multimillionaire Tory with a raft of low-paid workers in his empire and with many on 6-hour contracts is getting twitchy you know Ed is doing the right thing.
That MIGHT be true...so what is the answer ? Tax the tory to high heaven which makes him withdraw his company overseas and throws those who have work on the dole...the left want to destroy Murdoch empire...yet he has many thoundsands on his employment rota...would you want to throw them out of work as well...is it just a Labour thing that wants to destroy the Golden Goose.When a multimillionaire Tory with a raft of low-paid workers in his empire and with many on 6-hour contracts is getting twitchy you know Ed is doing the right thing.