Gay 'Pride'

[NMH]

But surelythe point is; what business of yours is it what they do in their own time? Why do people get so hung up on this subject? So, people are gay, they like members of their own sex, for fucks sake get over it. It's not your cup of tea, we get that. By slagging off some gay people you get some macho points, well done have a gold star.

And that Michael Fish comment about how his kids couldn't possibly be gay... you, sir, are a prize idiot.

Oh dear sten super, you aren't keeping up. It's not my business, but I can have an opinion on whether it's okay for society to condone homo marriages and adoption (because we are all members of society) and why it's not natural to be homo.

I could ask what business it is of yours to put your opinion in here, or vote in local or national elections, or talk about spousal abuse, mistreatment of animals, etc.
If you think I shouldn't have an opinion to talk about any subject on the table, you can f*** right off.

 

[NMH]

i don't know what you're getting so het up about - jesus LOVED it up the shitter.

You may be mistaking me for a Christian, who might find that statement upsetting.
You'll have to think up something else.

 

[Cian]

Oh dear sten super, you aren't keeping up. It's not my business, but I can have an opinion on whether it's okay for society to condone homo marriages and adoption (because we are all members of society) and why it's not natural to be homo.

Except you're not stating an opinion, you're stating things as fact, which is quite majorly different.

Either that, or you're now trying to change your position.

 

[Questions]

Except you're not stating an opinion, you're stating things as fact, which is quite majorly different.

Either that, or you're now trying to change your position.

Is that last line a dig at his sexuality ?

 

[NMH]

Except you're not stating an opinion, you're stating things as fact, which is quite majorly different.

Either that, or you're now trying to change your position.

That procreating requires a man and a woman IS fact - or can you think up a way to make that avertable? Some statements of fact have been referred to in order to base my opinion.
Perhaps YOU would like to change or 'muddy' the FACTS inherent in nature??

 

[Cian]

That procreating requires a man and a woman IS fact - or can you think up a way to make that avertable? Some statements of fact have been referred to in order to base my opinion.
Perhaps YOU would like to change or 'muddy' the FACTS inherent in nature??

No, you're stating that homosexuality is not natural as a fact. You cannot prove this, or even come close to.

 

[Lady Whistledown]

There seem to be people on here who would be verging on suicidal if their own kids turned out to be gay.

Aren't there more important things in the world?

What's worse, your offspring embarking on a mutually loving relationship with someone who just happens to be the same sex as them, or them telling you they're a bank-robbing, old-lady-mugging crackhead with an eighty quid a day habit?

I get the distinct impression there are a few on here who'd seriously consider the latter a better option when it came to telling the boys down the pub. How sad that in this day and age that we still feel the need to place people in convenient little boxes like this.

FFS, we're all human beings, and that's all it comes down to, surely?

Why do we constantly look for the differences in each other and seek to run them down?

 

[NMH]

Yes, I see you lot are trying your best to 'hyaena' at my opinion.

Unfortunately, the usual opinion that tirades against homosexuality is rednecked tattoo'd uneducated and often sexually represssed - and my opinion is that those rock apes do no arguments of their own any justice.

The alternative is the same sort among the gay opinion, and I can see you lot reverting to that style of opposing opinion in like fashion.

It's only 'natural' that you won't want to see or agree with any alternative opinion, and the closer to the truth it gets, the less you are going to like it. Fact.

 

[Cian]

Yes, I see you lot are trying your best to 'hyaena' at my opinion.

Unfortunately, the usual opinion that tirades against homosexuality is rednecked tattoo'd uneducated and often sexually represssed - and my opinion is that those rock apes do no arguments of their own any justice.

The alternative is the same sort among the gay opinion, and I can see you lot reverting to that style of opposing opinion in like fashion.

It's only 'natural' that you won't want to see or agree with any alternative opinion, and the closer to the truth it gets, the less you are going to like it. Fact.

As you run away from providing any evidence to support your assertions I see. Typical, eh.

 

[tip top]

There seem to be people on here who would be verging on suicidal if their own kids turned out to be gay.

Aren't there more important things in the world?

What's worse, your offspring embarking on a mutually loving relationship with someone who just happens to be the same sex as them, or them telling you they're a bank-robbing, old-lady-mugging crackhead with an eighty quid a day habit?

I get the distinct impression there are a few on here who'd seriously consider the latter a better option when it came to telling the boys down the pub. How sad that in this day and age that we still feel the need to place people in convenient little boxes like this.

FFS, we're all human beings, and that's all it comes down to, surely?

Why do we constantly look for the differences in each other and seek to run them down?

There isn't alot of things I agree with you on here EK, but that is one

 

[NMH]

No, you're stating that homosexuality is not natural as a fact. You cannot prove this, or even come close to.

How you can deny that heterosexuality is as natural as the genitals created in your own creation, is beyond me. If it was natural for a man to accept a penis until release of sperm, he would not have been made as a man - or he would have been androgenous, with a vagina as well as a a penis.
Otherwise, are you suggesting there has been some kind of mistake?

 

[NMH]

As you run away from providing any evidence to support your assertions I see. Typical, eh.

I see you are in a hurry to have the final word - what's up MYOB?

 

[Cian]

How you can deny that heterosexuality is as natural as the genitals created in your own creation, is beyond me. If it was natural for a man to accept a penis until release of sperm, he would not have been made as a man - or he would have been androgenous, with a vagina as well as a a penis.
Otherwise, are you suggesting there has been some kind of mistake?

Are you claiming every object only has one purpose? The penis is also used for urinating, as well as for copulation that does not always result in a(nother) pregnancy. Additionally, what does a use of genitalia have to do with something which is not physical, may I ask?

Homosexuality exists in all species, and has done so as far back as can be recorded. Its as natural as heterosexuality.

 

[NMH]

There seem to be people on here who would be verging on suicidal if their own kids turned out to be gay.

Aren't there more important things in the world?

What's worse, your offspring embarking on a mutually loving relationship with someone who just happens to be the same sex as them, or them telling you they're a bank-robbing, old-lady-mugging crackhead with an eighty quid a day habit?

I get the distinct impression there are a few on here who'd seriously consider the latter a better option when it came to telling the boys down the pub. How sad that in this day and age that we still feel the need to place people in convenient little boxes like this.

Why even bring in comparisons like those, in order to make ONE of them look right?

Crack-smoking, murdering, stealing, paedophilia, beastiality, cruellty..... some are non-consensual, some aren't. Why be upset about drug-addicts, alcoholics? Not hurting others are they?? Why not be happy your child is an alcoholic? - better than a thief or a murderer, how sad that we have to pigeonhole people who have made a CHOICE to take drugs and alcohol! Parents should love those alcoholics, and accept that it is THEIR CHOICE to drink alcohol. It's not illegal to drink alcohol.

 

[Cian]

Why even bring in comparisons like those, in order to make ONE of them look right?

Crack-smoking, murdering, stealing, paedophilia, beastiality, cruellty..... some are non-consensual, some aren't. Why be upset about drug-addicts, alcoholics? Not hurting others are they?? Why not be happy your child is an alcoholic? - better than a thief or a murderer, how sad that we have to pigeonhole people who have made a CHOICE to take drugs and alcohol! Parents should love those alcoholics, and accept that it is THEIR CHOICE to drink alcohol. It's not illegal to drink alcohol.

However, its not a choice to be gay, and its not illegal either, and it doesn't affect anyone else.

Yet there's people on here getting highly strung over it...

 

[NMH]

Are you claiming every object only has one purpose? The penis is also used for urinating, as well as for copulation that does not always result in a(nother) pregnancy. Additionally, what does a use of genitalia have to do with something which is not physical, may I ask?

Homosexuality exists in all species, and has done so as far back as can be recorded. Its as natural as heterosexuality.

So you compare mankind to such species as dogs (and I doubt many dogs that are not 'fixed' take pleasure from being humped, as it is usually a signal of force and domination) and the perverted animal behaviors that can be used as examples to back up your point? Further, you go from the 'recorded existence of homosexuality in other species' to leap into that making it as natural as heterosexuality?
Does that help you to 'qualify' "what you are about to receive" when you consider homosexual acts?

Interesting that you are able to stretch your imagination, to make it all work for you.

 

[Cian]

So you compare mankind to such species as dogs (and I doubt many dogs that are not 'fixed' take pleasure from being humped, as it is usually a signal of force and domination) and the perverted animal behaviors that can be used as examples to back up your point? Further, you go from the 'recorded existence of homosexuality in other species' to leap into that making it as natural as heterosexuality?
Does that help you to 'qualify' "what you are about to receive" when you consider homosexual acts?

Yes, yes I do.

Your entire post, other than the first line, is complete gibberish, however.

 

[Sheebo]

Yeh no need for them to rub it in peoples faces - You don't see a 'straight pride' do ya (i know it's changed names now but...)

 

[tip top]

Yeh no need for them to rub it in peoples faces - You don't see a 'straight pride' do ya (i know it's changed names now but...)

Here we go again

 

[Cian]

Pre-emptive strike, considering I've just remembered it

European Courts ruled, ooh, about 18 years ago that homosexuality was not a choice and was entirely natural, during the ruling on Norris vs. Ireland (where a sitting member of parliament had to sue to the state to get homosexuality decriminalised - and won)