portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,777
I thought I'd have a read of your posts. I can't remember why I have you on ignore. Most of the others on my list are either right wing loons or people with problematic behavious and obsessions that I find tiresome or depressing. Anyway....
I take the threat of Covid to the vulnerable very seriously. I agree that the government has sent so many mixed messages it has become a farce. And I agree that 'rules' are not and have never been consistently enforced or monitored.
However I also see the mortality data now not matching the cases data. This to me means the virus has probably mutated to a much less lethal variant. So the rational approach is not to impose blanket restrictions on everyone, but to let society go back to normal while providing protection (and directing the majority of the government spend towards this) for the vulnerable. Coherent, much less costly and, paradoxically, more likely to keep the vulnerable safe.
However, HMG's messages, now, can be interpreted to mean that me, in my early 60s, can lark about with five others, who can lark about with another five, so after three degrees of separation we have 125 people in close connection. That is madness.
Meanwhile, there are people on NSC who argue that HMG's guidance has been clear and logical throughout. The reason they think this is because they have made an interpretation of the guidance and its changes and have an accepting disposition and assume that by and large the best decisions are being taken on our behalf for the best reasons. Let's call this disposition a 'conservative' disposition. Unfortunately this continuous acceptance has not helped HMG focus their thoughts, so Cummings has been allowed to run riot. The numbers of deaths from Covid show that this trust is misplaced.
However, I have yet to read, not even from the most rabid Corbynite (admittedly there are few Corbynites on NSC...) a suggestion that now, months after the peak and during a period where a mutation seems likely, that martial law is required.
So, I'm not sure how your analytical and decision making processing works but it is probably best I keep you on ignore
(And stay away from guns).
Many ignore you if it’s any consolation. You’re an insufferable pompous bore, aptly named because of the b ollocks you infest this board with. I went off you quicker than a bucket of prawns in the sun some time ago so happy to remain ignored. I’ve not read your post, except the opening sentence. Just doing you the courtesy of a reminding you not to waste your time. Off you feck, there’s a good gonad.