US is the man to ask, a genuine expert however as an Estate Agent of 25years Freehold Flats I.e where there is no lease for the individual flat are very hard to sell and often a great risk to the lender, when times were good not so long ago I could count on one hand how many lenders who would consider and i mean consider! Is this a flat where the is just one other above/below or a block? You also need to condier when you re sell, imho a freehold flat should be at leat 10% less than an ordanary leasehold flat due to the restrictive lending criteria hope that helps.Im thinking of buying this freehold flat does anyone know what banks will lend on a freehold flat any advise please
The Royal Bank of Scotland is the way to go. PM me for rates.
US - why are lenders less interested in freehold flats?
Surely there's more risk with leasehold, e.g. lease gets defaulted if the ground rent's not paid, freeholder may not maintain the building properly?
I'm sure you're right, just interested really....
And keeping things simple stupid if your flat is under or over said freehold flat that has fallen into a state of dis repair i think you will agree the value of yours will be compromised and with the mortgage being secured on the value you understand why lenders are concerned! When the is a freehold house converted into the flats the individual flats will have a lease with responsibility toowards upkeepWith a freehold flat there is no legal requirement for works to be done on the flat. The freehold is owned by the owners of the flat and if they want to do no work on the property and let it fall into a state of disrepair they can much like a house which is freehold but lenders view several people agreeing on things riskier.
Or First Active.