Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
HSBC will probably do it but it is direct business only.
why will they not lend on freehold flats , what makes them so risky ? i would have thought its the other way round ?There's leasehold flats - all lenders will lend
There's leasehold, share of freehold flats - nearly all lenders will lend
There's freehold flats - a handful of lenders will lend
There's flying freehold - a handful of lenders will lend
Quote:why will they not lend on freehold flats , what makes them so risky ? i would have thought its the other way round ?
why will they not lend on freehold flats , what makes them so risky ? i would have thought its the other way round ?
I'll try & explain:
When you buy a conventional Leasehold Flat, each flat in the block (be it a block or house conversion) will have a Lease which is given by the original freeholder. The lease is the legal document that stipulates what you own & what you don't, what you have to repair, what you have to contribute to & most other things that you can & can't do to your flat.
The Lease will contain legal covenants that makes each leaseholder responsible for for various repairs (or by way of contributions to a maintenance fund).
For example:
If I owned the top floor flat of a two-story conversion the lease might make me responsible for repairing the roof or guttering if it leaked. If I owned the ground floor the lease might make me responsible for repairing the drains or foundations.
Why does this matter?
If the guttering on the top floor leaked & made the ground floor walls damp, the owner of the ground floor flat would be able to take the owner of the top floor flat to court if they did not repair the guttering (as they were supposed to do under the lease).
Why does this matter when getting a mortgage?
If the owner of the top floor flat did not repair the guttering & the damp got worse in the ground floor flat, the ground floor flat's value would decrease.
A bank always needs to look at future marketability should they repossess the property. I the flats in our example were freehold & the bank repssessed the ground floor flat, it would not have a legal leg to stand on to make the owner of the top floor flat get the guttering fixed.
Or another example would be the owner of a ground floor flat not maintaining the walls. If the top floor flat started collapsing, the owner of the top floor flat (or mortgagee in possession) wouldn't be able to make the owner of the ground floor flat repair them; thus rendering your property worthless. In otherwords, if you don't own the structure that your property sits on, or there is no lease in place, you are the mercy of someone else if anything goes wrong.
Here endeth today's lesson.
If anyone needs any more advice, please PM me, let's not bore the whole of NSC!
Very nicely put, you still wouldnt convince a nice old dear though that a Freehold flat is the devils spawn, they buy it anyway often against their solicitors and familys advice live happily ever after, move to heaven and then leave it to the family to deal with
Here endeth today's lesson.
If anyone needs any more advice, please PM me, let's not bore the whole of NSC!