Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Foul on Webster by Haaland ??

Was it a foul on Webster ??

  • Yes

    Votes: 92 60.9%
  • No

    Votes: 59 39.1%

  • Total voters
    151


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,404
Location Location
Looked like a shove to me, he had both hands on Websters back. Shoulder-barges are one thing, but he basically manhandled Webster out of the way. Zero surprise he was given the benefit though.

Of greater concern for me, was WTF was Sanchez doing ?? Off his line, outside the box, nowhere near intercepting anything. Its yet another FFS moment from our keeper to add to the growing collection.
 








Husty

Mooderator
Oct 18, 2008
11,998
There is nothing wrong with a fair shoulder charge. At least that was what I was brought up to believe. What I object to is where one player uses both hands to push his opponent whether it be in the front or from behind and present day referees seem to think its fair game. I can't help but remember Tarkowski's push on Maupay which led to Burnley scoring and our esteemed Geordie friend Sheareer thought "that's how you do it"
Ever thought that maybe the rules of the game might have deviated in the last 50 years from ‘what you were brought up to believe’ :lolol:
 


Husty

Mooderator
Oct 18, 2008
11,998
So someone has to be built like giant to defend against Haaland otherwise they are light weight.A fair shoulder to shoulder is next to each other while running,can you imagine Lamptey getting that treatment from him.It was a foul imo.Mind I would have an issue with Sanchez quarter way up the pitch.
Yes? It’s a contact sport…
 




Lifelong Supporter

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2009
2,104
Burgess Hill
The referee would have brought a lot of pressure on himself to have given a foul there seeing as it would have disallowed the goal. A real 50/50 decision I think. We brought it on ourselves with none of Dunk/Webster/Sanchez coming out of it with credit. We got what we deserved.
 


mikeyjh

Well-known member
Dec 17, 2008
4,607
Llanymawddwy
No foul. Its a contact sport.

Haaland was just stronger.

Find it hard to blame Webster. Don't think there's more than two or three PL CBs that could challenge Haaland in such a situation.
I don't think there's any, when Haalands touch took the ball beyond Webster, his momentum and and direction gave him no chance. I don't think any Brighton player made even a whimper of a claim for a foul, rightly.
 


Horses Arse

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2004
4,571
here and there
No foul. Its a contact sport.

Haaland was just stronger.

Find it hard to blame Webster. Don't think there's more than two or three PL CBs that could challenge Haaland in such a situation.
If it had been a shoulder barge it would have been fine, he shoved him out of the way using his hand. There was no need to, his body/shoulder would suffice. Grabbing and pulling is a foul, not deemed fair in this contact sport. Shoving is the same. Getting your body in the way isn't a foul.
 




Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,463
Hove
View attachment 153028

Point of contact.

We need to see less of these given as fouls so I'm fine with it. Haaland has nowhere else to go as Webster is coming across him.
If it stayed like that, shoulder to shoulder I’d agree with you, BUT Harlaand extends that right arm to push Webster over - that’s the foul.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,139
Goldstone
Watching the highlights on MOTD I see Webster sliding across the floor, arms stretched out in front of him, admiring Haaland. If Webster had been doubled up in agony, as any top 6 defender would have been, he'd have a decent chance of getting the free kick.

You can call it honest, but in today's game is strikes me as basically unprofessional.
 






The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,399
View attachment 153028

Point of contact.

We need to see less of these given as fouls so I'm fine with it. Haaland has nowhere else to go as Webster is coming across him.
I get your point but unfortunately, these kind of things will continue to be given when it’s in favour of a bigger side

That Arsenal/Leeds one the other day was very similar and they ruled the goal out as the contact, if small, made the defender off balance.
 


raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,347
Wiltshire
Foul last 10 years - yes
Foul this season - never know
Foul by Man City player according to ref and VAR - no
Foul by BHA player according to ref and VAR if it was other way round - 85% yes - ref would’ve been sprinting to the monitor

They don’t need the help yet still VAR etc give it to them all against ‘smaller’ teams with less money.
They could just program the teams colours into the VAR computer and speed up the decision making
 


DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,816
Wiltshire
Watching the highlights on MOTD I see Webster sliding across the floor, arms stretched out in front of him, admiring Haaland. If Webster had been doubled up in agony, as any top 6 defender would have been, he'd have a decent chance of getting the free kick.

You can call it honest, but in today's game is strikes me as basically unprofessional.
cobblers. He had has arms out to say “foul”.
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Watching the highlights on MOTD I see Webster sliding across the floor, arms stretched out in front of him, admiring Haaland. If Webster had been doubled up in agony, as any top 6 defender would have been, he'd have a decent chance of getting the free kick.

You can call it honest, but in today's game is strikes me as basically unprofessional.
Should you not be supporting a different team if you want players to cheat? Forest maybe? :lolol:

I have hated professional fouls since the defeat by Notts County at Wembley under Warnock.

Hate it when our players cheat, absolutely nothing professional about it

We were playing at City, there is no way Webster would have got that obvious foul given even if he’d jumped up screaming and holding a part of his anatomy and then fallen down again in simulated agony.
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,139
Goldstone
Should you not be supporting a different team if you want players to cheat? Forest maybe? :lolol:

I have hated professional fouls since the defeat by Notts County at Wembley under Warnock.

Hate it when our players cheat, absolutely nothing professional about it
But it wouldn't have been a dive, he was knocked flying. It would have just been highlighting how much contact there was.
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
But it wouldn't have been a dive, he was knocked flying. It would have just been highlighting how much contact there was.
Not sure he could have gone down harder, he was swatted aside by a beast :shrug:

What would you have liked him to have done?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here