Padders
New member
In very simple terms, the meaning of socialism is undemacratic, they dont represent the majority, they represent the minority.
Absolute tosh. Socialism is egalitarian, promoting equal rights for all.
In very simple terms, the meaning of socialism is undemacratic, they dont represent the majority, they represent the minority.
Absolute tosh. Socialism is egalitarian, promoting equal rights for all.
And we will see them off again.
Don't know, reckon a good lawyer could get him off...although he mentions the name of an NSC user in directing his post, and some other people who may be racist, he doesn't directly state a belief that the said user is also racist!
Centre left Socialisum like the Labour partys is, yes your correct. But then again, that statement could be said for the Torys and the Lib Dems.
You said socialism is undemocratic, which is just plain wrong.
You said socialism is undemocratic, which is just plain wrong.
Now all we need is an anti-chav party to adjust that imbalance.
I thought that one of the central pillars of socialism was that everyone was equal, although in practice there will always be those who are more equal than others, this is not an accusation that can be levelled at the BNP...who would never regard a black, gay or jew on anywhere near equal terms...I would have thought a comparison with fascism more appropriate.
The one good thing that might come out of the BNP gains, is that it could wake up a few malcontent oiks/gangs/thugs that survive on crime and yet still blame their colour for it. If there's any chance of their running the streets, then they might realize what credibility that only gives to the likes of the BNP party.
Now all we need is an anti-chav party to adjust that imbalance.
Don't we still have a need to provide an equal voice for all?
There's a side to this that says - unless you know what the enemy think, you can't know what you are fighting against.
Griffin is particularly amusing in that he cannot HELP but reveal his dark side, despite clumsy attempts to veil it.
I wonder where the BNP stand on chavs...are they viewed as some sort of master race, being white and those least likely to be upwardly mobile and thus see their position in life most threatened by immigration.
They had a policy a few years ago of paying single mothers (probably only the white ones) to stay at home. No encouragement to work (even part time) just stay at home.
Seemed to have been dropped quietly, along with the international policies supporting their muslim brothers in their fight against Israel.
You see, that's why I have absolutely no time for them at all.
It's ok for that bloke from Coventry to pretend that the BNP have bagels on the afternoon menu now, but only a few years ago they were getting down with the Palestinians.
It's all a load of hot air, the BNP or any radical party will never gain control of this country, the majority of people see sense and will defend our civil liberties like in the 30's, they may gain a few voters as a protest against the current government, but when the situation resolves the extremist parties will once again be niche and only the few delinquents will bang their drum.
ra**sts - is 'racists' a swear word itself now??
So Labour can drop clause 4 but the BNP can't drop their support for the palestinians?
One day I'll compile a list of your very odd parallels.
For the time being I'll put it down to your love of ley lines and the spirit of King Arthur entering Uranus (or something like that)