Falmer ***** argus online

[vulture]

Would not hold meeting as argus was there.They will now hold a secret meetingwhat a bunch of ****son argus website

 

[Trigger]

Next they will be playing kiss chase. :shudders:

 

[Cantona's Flying Dropkick]

Argus Link

 

[aftershavedave]

they really are asking for long-term problems with the good people of brighton aren't they. an absolutely disgraceful abuse of the democratic process. that cut-throat woman deserves to rot in hell

 

[BRIGHT ON Q]

I just cant see these spite full fuckers letting this lye.I will be amazed if they just let us get on with building it.

 

[vulture]

I could never build bridges with these ****s ever

 

[balloonboy]

They must be loving this. I find it incredible how such a miniscule number of people can threaten such a massively positive development for the City of Brighton & Hove. It makes me question the way we run this country - it's democracy gone crazy.

 

[Djmiles]

They should be ashamed of themselves.

I've got a good idea, let's give FREE tickets to Cardiff fans and invite them down for a pre-season game when Falmer is built.

Should be fun for the residents

 

[cannedheat]

Dont worry about the FPC opposition it is no more than a dying person death rattle, that last little croaking sound bnefore they curl up and die.

 

[vulture]

Dont worry about the FPC opposition it is no more than a dying person death rattle, that last little croaking sound bnefore they curl up and die.

Im starting to dread they have something up thier sleeve

 

[Cantona's Flying Dropkick]

Craptic spouting its inane drivel again.

 

[severnside gull]

are we clear that they must meet the costs themselves or do they get public funds to sue the government (not so odd as prisoners, for example, get public money to contest their grievances against the system)?

if they have to pay I reckon they are looking at a minimum £50K for a cause their advisors (the same as Lewes) say is lost. Crazy

 

[Yorkie]

are we clear that they must meet the costs themselves or do they get public funds to sue the government (not so odd as prisoners, for example, get public money to contest their grievances against the system)?

if they have to pay I reckon they are looking at a minimum £50K for a cause their advisors (the same as Lewes) say is lost. Crazy

And the rest. £250K is more like it. The only public funds they could get is council tax payers money and Lewes have blocked that avenue.

 

[Nemesis]

BAN THE BUN.

Time to hurt the Cuttresses where it matters most to them....boycott Forfars.

 

[vulture]

And the rest. £250K is more like it. The only public funds they could get is council tax payers money and Lewes have blocked that avenue.

Yorkie,I have just been on line and their is a begging letter in Nov 2005 from Cutress to Lewes dc where it states the most Falmer can raise is £30,000 from the council funds and £50,000 private

 

[Yorkie]

Yorkie,I have just been on line and their is a begging letter in Nov 2005 from Cutress to Lewes dc where it states the most Falmer can raise is £30,000 from the council funds and £50,000 private

I am saying that an appeal could cost them up to £250K. Severnside had posted it would cost them 50K. That's why I said 'and the rest'
As Lord B has pointed out, the Government would use very expensive lawyers.

 

[Superseagull]

How can you have a meeting to decide whether to blow £250K+ of PUBLIC FUNDS fighting the stadium 'in someones house', off the record, unminuted? Cutress & her fellow NIMBY's really are taking the piss. Is there not a local government ombudsman who can step in and sort this lot out? I don't see how such things can be done in public. How can you ban the press from reporting on a PUBLIC meeting?

 

[vulture]

How can you have a meeting to decide whether to blow £250K+ of PUBLIC FUNDS fighting the stadium 'in someones house', off the record, unminuted? Cutress & her fellow NIMBY's really are taking the piss. Is there not a local government ombudsman who can step in and sort this lot out? I don't see how such things can be done in public. How can you ban the press from reporting on a PUBLIC meeting?

They have not got 250 grand.The most they can raise is 80 and that is from cutress herself(thats all the nimbys putting hands in pocket)

 

[Easy 10]

How can you have a meeting to decide whether to blow £250K+ of PUBLIC FUNDS fighting the stadium 'in someones house', off the record, unminuted? Cutress & her fellow NIMBY's really are taking the piss. Is there not a local government ombudsman who can step in and sort this lot out? I don't see how such things can be done in public. How can you ban the press from reporting on a PUBLIC meeting?

FPC do not have access to the kind of public funds LDC have already squandered (I gather a small percentage of the Falmer parisheners council tax goes towards FPC, perhaps Lord B could confirm ?). Any challenge launched by FPC will largely have to be funded privately and with pledges from CPRE / Sussex Downsmen. Whether anyone would be prepared to commit the kind of money required to challenge this (and ultimately just get it referred back to the S of S, who could just say YES again) remains to be seen, but they would have to be either incredibly confident or incredibly stupid.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

I am getting a bit bored of these daily battles on the Argus website. Another day, another ill-informed nimby.