Extremism - both sides

[looney]

The Government (whoever they are) just live on soundbytes if it buys them some more power.

Not are, were, thats history 1918.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Not are, were, thats history 1918.

And are you foolish enough to think they still don't buy votes?

 

[looney]

And are you foolish enough to think they still don't buy votes?

Pretty sure it was Churchil who brought the Bill in on behalf of the Liberal Government. And no not in this case,.

 

[looney]

Classy.

You wouldn't know what classy is retard. You know I;m dyslexic right?

With comments like

Who's Yepm?

and

This

Haha! He really is. His post genuinely made me laugh out loud. Once I'd understood the fractured English.

In this thread alone, and your continual snipes about not understanding what I am posting which I could dig out your posting history. Now I now the Mods like playing favourites but do you think they will let continually mocking disabilities slide?

Go on the ******, I effing dare you to say you dont know what I am posting about.

 

[drew]

No that is superstition, the government gave women the vote for war service. As it was stated that women shouldn't vote because they cant do a mans job.

Really? So without the pressure from the suffragette movement the Government of the day were always going to give women the vote.

 

[looney]

Really? So without the pressure from the suffragette movement the Government of the day were always going to give women the vote.

Nope. What I am saying was the arguments against were 2 fold. That they couldn't do a mans job or defend the country. Half the argument fell away during WW1 with women in factories. Maybe you should do more research into feminist extremist history rather than swallowing the feminist line.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Nope. What I am saying was the arguments against were 2 fold. That they couldn't do a mans job or defend the country. Half the argument fell away during WW1 with women in factories. Maybe you should do more research into feminist extremist history rather than swallowing the feminist line.

Or maybe you should tell people why only HALF the argument fell away and not the whole one?

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

Plus of course there is the minor point that the far left are a much bigger threat to this country as they appear to be on the verge of gaining power. Not that their recent converts would acknowledge they are far left/extreme. Apparently in our brave new progressive world people who have spent their lifetime hating this country and aligning themselves with people responsible for killing our fellow citizens are OK. People who call for insurrection and encourage violent protest against our democratically elected government are OK.

Do you write leaders for the Daily Mail?

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

One mans fool is anothers idol.

However I like this...



I have all the heart and energy for socialism, it's just a shame it is preached by fools.

Who can argue with the basic principle of "from each according to his means, to each according to his needs"?

I guess it is the extent of the "according to" which would be in question, although there would be the extreme "It's my money, why should anyone else have any of it" approach.

 

[The Clamp]

You wouldn't know what classy is retard. You know I;m dyslexic right?

With comments like


and

This


In this thread alone, and your continual snipes about not understanding what I am posting which I could dig out your posting history. Now I now the Mods like playing favourites but do you think they will let continually mocking disabilities slide?

Go on the ******, I effing dare you to say you dont know what I am posting about.

I imagine the mods would dislike the mocking of dyslexia as much as they would dislike your use of the word retard.
Goodnight.

 

[Albion my Albion]

TLDR

Welcome to my ignore list. List of members:
You

Please, please, please, add me.

 

[Albion my Albion]

I imagine the mods would dislike the mocking of dyslexia as much as they would dislike your use of the word retard.
Goodnight.

I'm overjoyed to be a retarded dsylexic.

 

[Tyrone Biggums]

Really? So without the pressure from the suffragette movement the Government of the day were always going to give women the vote.

People forget that a great % of men were also unable to vote at that same time. Around 40% of the male voting age population was ineligible to vote.

So yes it's possible that women would have got the vote without the suffragette movement.

The 1918 Act brought more than eight million women into the electorate, but it also enfranchised more than five million men over the age of 21 to vote as well.

 

[looney]

I imagine the mods would dislike the mocking of dyslexia as much as they would dislike your use of the word retard.
Goodnight.

Oh Ones a speach code the other isn't anyway we'll find out fool

 

[looney]

Or maybe you should tell people why only HALF the argument fell away and not the whole one?

Because the other half was saying women couldn't fight to defend the country, this was not put to the test in WW1 so was not invalidated.

 

[El Presidente]

Can I respectfully suggest that [MENTION=277]looney[/MENTION] and [MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION] either put each other on their ignore list, or get a room.

Your continual insults of each other isn't doing either of you any favours, and you either cut it out or accept that you will be taking a holiday from NSC for a few weeks.

 

[WATFORD zero]

Looney and The Clamp on holiday together - How sweeet

 

[symyjym]

Dispatches - Undercover Mosque: The Return - Real Stories

https://youtu.be/3WgVa3VRFb4

Well worth a watch.

 

[looney]

Can I respectfully suggest that [MENTION=277]looney[/MENTION] and [MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION] either put each other on their ignore list, or get a room.

Your continual insults of each other isn't doing either of you any favours, and you either cut it out or accept that you will be taking a holiday from NSC for a few weeks.

I do realise your a crap mod so I'll help you out. Its not some 50/50 to and throw as you lamely suggest in your Pontius Pilot type role of High Priest of Moral Relatavism,The idiot keeps leeping on my posts at what appears to be random, he posts nothing to do with the topic.

This is ok in your book? So can I start following people round the boards doing the same?

 

[hans kraay fan club]

I do realise your a crap mod so I'll help you out. Its not some 50/50 to and throw as you lamely suggest in your Pontius Pilot type role of High Priest of Moral Relatavism,The idiot keeps leeping on my posts at what appears to be random, he posts nothing to do with the topic.

This is ok in your book? So can I start following people round the boards doing the same?

Oh well. You can't say he didn't ask nicely first.

Cheerio.