[tweet]1465797427949154305[/tweet]
Connolly scored tonight for the ROI.....
View attachment 142477
BBC Sport consider one-sided women's WC qualifying to be more important than matches in the world's richest league - in headlines and scores on the right.
As someone who watched Newcastle vs Norwich, it sounds like a sensible decision.
But the live score/results panel on the right is ordered by importance by BBC Sport - and they've put WWC ahead of PL.
Random fact. Jill Scott makes me my coffee most days.
She owns a coffee shop doesn’t she?
View attachment 142477
BBC Sport consider one-sided women's WC qualifying to be more important than matches in the world's richest league - in headlines and scores on the right.
Not a problem, just the beginning.
Leading countries have only recently invested, but it's loose change compared to the mens' game.
Smaller countries will follow suit... watch this space.
Amongst all the piss-taking, this is it. Very, very early stages of development for many countries……and they are coming up against the likes of England where the players have improved very rapidly over recent years so the gap is enormous.
View attachment 142477
BBC Sport consider one-sided women's WC qualifying to be more important than matches in the world's richest league - in headlines and scores on the right.
BBC Sport consider one-sided women's WC qualifying to be more important than
There’s a lot of talk about how England’s men team qualify with relative ease, they scored 39 goals in 10 games. England W have 53 in 6. And they won one game 1-0.
Women’s football clearly needs some pre-qualifiers currently, maybe they can be removed once the game grows to a level of popularity that can support international football. However if you’re a young girl in Latvia is watching your national team lose 20-0 really going to inspire you to go out and start playing football?