Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
158-3.
Nash falls 4 short of a century.
Nash falls 4 short of a century.
I'm sorry UB, i blame myself for that
I'm sorry UB, i blame myself for that
was it your slower ball or did you decieve him with your inswinger which swings out and then back in again and yorks him?
More likely Nash was trying to smash the spinner out the ground to get his 100 with a big shot and so getting bowled.
I don't doubt it but the ball I described would a helluva weapon in any bowlers' armoury...eh?
I would have played that ball for a boundary...
Right-ho.
From someone who has problems fending off the mesmeric bowling of Trigger that claim seems to have little substance.
That bowl into the balls was early in the innings and was certainly too high to have been of any danger, other than to myself.
Nonetheless accurate bowling at such a small target...
That bowl into the balls was early in the innings and was certainly too high to have been of any danger, other than to myself.