Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Dunk ‘handball’







Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,270
Cumbria
Dunks arm was behind his back. The ball ricocheted off his back onto his elbow.
Absolutely scandalous as usual.
If it did touch his back, then there's no excuse for the ref at all.

1691862558702.png
 


Drebin

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2011
860
Norway
I think it was given for two reasons.
a, var want to support the ref more this season
b, var want to spend less time making these decisions than they have previously (and got criticized for). Had they done that or sent the ref to the monitor I think it would have been overturned.

Had we dropped points because of that I think Howard Webb might have been parking in his usual spot on Monday morning.
 










Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319








Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,146
Faversham
Howard Webb can come up with as much shiny new policy bollox as he wants.....

Refs can get it wrong in real time, but those utter pillocks in Stockley Park are nothing short of incompetent.

They seem more keen to double down and protect the refs reputation than get crucial decisions right.

It was a ludicrous decision. But the real crime is that VAR approved it.

VAR has become a total inconsistent shambles under Howard Webb, we don't need ref audio, or TV highlights shows, we need competent officiating in VAR.

Mich more of this, then he needs to go.


More woke nonsense from....

Oh. Hang on. Yep, GL right again.
 






Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,929
Apart from the forearm into JP s throat / face
yes nothing there to make the ref give a pen 🤔
Convince me VAR would have called him to the screen. He shouldn't have his arms raised, but we see it all the time. It really was nothing. Pedro collapsed like a sack of potatoes. I think it's important to analyse decisions from a neutral perspective or not at all really. I thought the ref was good today, given the new rulings, but both penalties I would not have given. Although, applying the rules very strictly, there could be an argument for both. A silly argument that got sillier.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,553
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Gonna be on in a bit on the Game of the Day on Sky 402
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,553
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Just seen it, ridiculous decision
 






maresfield seagull

Well-known member
May 23, 2006
2,317
Convince me VAR would have called him to the screen. He shouldn't have his arms raised, but we see it all the time. It really was nothing. Pedro collapsed like a sack of potatoes. I think it's important to analyse decisions from a neutral perspective or not at all really. I thought the ref was good today, given the new rulings, but both penalties I would not have given. Although, applying the rules very strictly, there could be an argument for both. A silly argument that got sillier.
Let's review in the morning Once dissected by the TV experts 😉
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,019
one of the stupidest handballs seen given.

if thats how rules apply, we're going to get to a point where oppositon deliberatly kick the ball at defenders arms.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here