beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
not sure its "for a laugh" seems a dedicated purpose to cause disruption. wonder if a environmental group claim responsibility at some point.
But it’s “their” human right to protest?! How can you argue otherwise?! It’s a “crushing blow” to democracy if they can’t! where you’ve gone wrong is you’re only thinking from all the hundreds of thousands inconvenienced perspective; you need to thinking about the handful of entitled individuals doing this for, we, the people...
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ence-for-blocking-stansted-deportation-flight
I suspect there might be a bit more to this. The drone isn't some hobby toy one given the flight times. Probably some kind of commercial or even military drone?
Quite possibly, It just makes me laugh the way so many posters think they know exactly how to deal with it, when in reality no one knows exactly what it is they have to deal with!
Oh yeah, I forgot to care what a handful of nimrods think...
Naughty, inconsiderate me
Quite possibly, It just makes me laugh the way so many posters think they know exactly how to deal with it, when in reality no one knows exactly what it is they have to deal with!
What's the betting it'll be some manchild who lives with his mum and relies on the tried and trusted 'autistic spectrum' defence in court?
Including the Police it would seem
Sussex Police have confirmed the drone is believed to be "of industrial specification". I'm guessing that means it isn't something you can buy in the local high street... but what is an industrial specification drone?
Where are Dastardly and Mutley when you need them?
Where are Dastardly and Mutley when you need them?
Indeed. Although I reckon Air Traffic Control systems have been hacked.I'm no David Icke but how about a conspiracy theory?
The drone story is a cover. Drones cannot stay up for this length of time, and no reports are evident that this is an environmental protest.
The real story is that the security services have a credible threat of a terrorist operation at Gatwick where they plan to down an incoming/outgoing airliner with a surface to air missile. The cover story is in place in order to provide an explanation for the airport closure and avoid a mass panic across the country/world when people realise that terrorists now have this capability. In the meantime, with the airport closed and the threat neutralised, the authorities go about establishing if the threat is real etc.
Anyone?