Dick Knights Mumm
Take me Home Falmer Road
I have the same rule, but my upper limit is higher! ;-)
Very good. That did actually make me laugh.
I have the same rule, but my upper limit is higher! ;-)
I'd tend to agree with you about Reading and wasn't really surprised that he didn't take the job - he has however essentially denied that he made the alleged phone call to TB in March of last year.
What evidence do you expect? A copy of the notes of Gus' disciplinary hearing perhaps?
I thought he had denied it!
"I had an opportunity to leave for a Premiership club. Everything was agreed. I was given permission to talk to the club. They made me an unbelievable offer - very difficult to refuse and I was loyal."
"I was loyal to the club and I decided to stay. So how you can explain that somebody says to you they want to leave and a week later got the chance to go to a Premiership club with a better deal, with a better project and stays. It's not common sense that's for sure."
But why should people trust you?
All the facts you have mentioned are:
-He refused to deal with the retained list - Ok, but i still don't understand why the club wanted him to deal with it if he wanted out, and according to all the timelines had already committed gross misconduc
-He was selling himself in interviews -
With this info why is it so wierd that people are yet to be completely convinced?
I gave a couple of examples (there are more), but it is up to you whether you trust the club's judgement WRT Gus' dismissal. IMHO, given the information in the public domain (and without the info that isn't), the club were right to sack him. Others see it otherwise.
First I'd heard of it. Can you provide a link please?
I thought he had denied it!
"I had an opportunity to leave for a Premiership club. Everything was agreed. I was given permission to talk to the club. They made me an unbelievable offer - very difficult to refuse and I was loyal."
"I was loyal to the club and I decided to stay. So how you can explain that somebody says to you they want to leave and a week later got the chance to go to a Premiership club with a better deal, with a better project and stays. It's not common sense that's for sure."
OTHERWISE THEN ,UNTIL SOMEONE TELLS THE TRUTH OF WHAT HAPPENED.
how the club and yourself can expect anyone to take the "take it or leave it" attitude beats me
it would be interesting to know why this never got to court?
Because Gus didn't have a case.
or he took the money and ran?
No money paid to him (info in the public domain). He dropped the case (he knew he would lose).
and you know this because?
No money paid to him (info in the public domain). He dropped the case (he knew he would lose).
Both the club and GP have stated the issue was sorted - nowhere have they said money didn't change hands, in either direction.
I gave a couple of examples (there are more), but it is up to you whether you trust the club's judgement WRT Gus' dismissal. IMHO, given the information in the public domain (and even without the info that isn't), the club were still right to sack him. Others see it otherwise.