keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,975
It's a self-parody.
I'm beginning to think BW is actually Diego Poyet, and he'll become so objectionable people will think "actually i'm on Gus' side".
It's a self-parody.
And JFC disappears from Oscar's line up when enough seniors are fit. I'd say it's only Ince who has really come through under Oscar, the others as used as needed, as they were under gus, except they've been needed more often under Oscar.
Over the last two season Gus used in the first team match squad:
JFC, Dickenson, March, Oatway, Barker, Agdestein, Dunk, Kasim, Hall, Cook, Sampayo,
I'm beginning to think BW is actually Diego Poyet, and he'll become so objectionable people will think "actually i'm on Gus' side".
Whereas you're clearly a voice of sanity and reason who should be trusted.
I'm beginning to think BW is actually Diego Poyet, and he'll become so objectionable people will think "actually i'm on Gus' side".
Why thank you.
My point was that, until properly verified evidence otherwise, both parties are guilty.
I have a self-imposed NSC rule. If I have posted the same thing 500 times - I stop posting it. For my sanity and so that others do not think I am completely mental.
I have provided arguments for why you should side with the club over Gus WITHOUT being ITK. You chose not to accept those, and that is your prerogative (as I said before).
However, insulting comments like "attitude of a child not being listened to" are just wrong; do you not understand what me saying 'that is your prerogative' means? That's hardly me being childish, or getting upset at not being listened to, is it?
I don't know why you bother to be honest. There are some on this board who won't believe any fault of Gus, and nothing you say will convince them. Some simply want to lay the blame for this saga totally at the door of Paul Barber and / or Tony.
I'd give up - you won't change any minds. Your words in my opinion are wasted.
and nothing you say will convince them. .
He's never said anything other than "I know what happened but I can't say"
I find facts and evidence normally convice people.
Suggest you re-read my posts. I provided arguments you chose to ignore (as I said before).
Suggest you re-read my posts. I provided arguments you chose to ignore (as I said before).
Unfortunately it will be Gus's version
One thing I would like to know from Poyet though is his version of the March phone call because he has not yet denied or admitted that this had happened. I think it is important for him to at least clear this up.
I thought he had denied it!
"I had an opportunity to leave for a Premiership club. Everything was agreed. I was given permission to talk to the club. They made me an unbelievable offer - very difficult to refuse and I was loyal."
"I was loyal to the club and I decided to stay. So how you can explain that somebody says to you they want to leave and a week later got the chance to go to a Premiership club with a better deal, with a better project and stays. It's not common sense that's for sure."
Arguments and facts / evidence are two completely different things.
Call me a cynic - Reading in free fall to the division that the Albion had every chance of getting out of at the time. Potential promotion on your CV and leave afterwards or a relegation on your cv (not his fault but it would have been there) and another season in the second tier. I can see exacty why he'd turn it down. Didn't rumour have it that he was actually in his car on the way to Reading to sign and changed his mind en route?
I quite like the Gus spin though.
I read your arguments.
I realised they wern't facts.
I asked for facts or evidence.
You gave none.
I'd tend to agree with you about Reading and wasn't really surprised that he didn't take the job - he has however essentially denied that he made the alleged phone call to TB in March of last year.