looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Surely a libel case would have to damage a person's reputation.
No-one knows who you are so how has your reputation been damaged?
And if people do know who I am? This is after all a supporters forum.
Surely a libel case would have to damage a person's reputation.
No-one knows who you are so how has your reputation been damaged?
And if people do know who I am? This is after all a supporters forum.
Which is not a good way of trying to circument the libel laws so I suggest you withdraw your accusation.
There is plenty to question about Khans conduct and motives and none have a racial dimension.
Back to the issue at hand, this is amusing:-
19 things Donald Trump knows better than anyone else, according to Donald Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-trump/?postshare=8441475601515785&tid=ss_tw
its like he just thinks he can say anything he likes, anything he wants to claim and it wont be challenged and wont have to back it up.
Jim Davidson appears to be supporting him. Perhaps Trump will now hail him as a World Famous Popular British Comedian.
http://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv...Conservative-Party-Conference-Hillary-Clinton
That's brilliant. What weight does he have to throw exactly? An unfunny, misogynistic racist who is most well known these days for making a tit of himself on reality tv. I bet Hilary is shitting herself.The sub editor has pretty much summed up The Donald, and his campaign:-
Jim Davidson throws his weight behind Donald Trump amid Tory party conference return
I can assure you I know what constitutes ''libel laws''
If it wasn't serious I would find Trump and Hilary most amusing. Trouble is the brain dead Americans have these two fools to choose from. Dangerous fools both of them!
It's funny right up to the point you see a tweet like this:-
[tweet]783377379775303681[/tweet]
That is surely a no contest.Interesting. It'll be a close call between two idiots. Which one is the least dangerous?
That is surely a no contest.
Ok so Hillary may well fail 'the optics test' in a normal race for the presidency.
But The Donald is anything but normal, and is hatstand dangerous.
I'm not supporting either and I think Hilary will win in the end but, I consider both woefully inadequate for such an important job. If Hilary wins her presidency it will be full of trauma as would a Trump presidency.
Obviously not, how far do you want to run with this?
It's a pair of very disappointing candidates, isn't it? If the Democrats had managed to put forward anybody with the slightest hint of charisma and flair, they'd have this in the bag by now. Instead, we get Hillary Wife Of Clinton.
I feel like I should be on her side, as the potential first female President of the United States, and yet she doesn't strike me as anything like the outstanding candidate she should be. I hope she wins, but largely only from an Anyone But Trump perspective.