beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,014
well exactly, it doesnt make sense. but packet that would cost £1 or less here can be $10-20 there.Excuse my ignorance, but how can a generic be more expensive in the US?
well exactly, it doesnt make sense. but packet that would cost £1 or less here can be $10-20 there.Excuse my ignorance, but how can a generic be more expensive in the US?
Weird.well exactly, it doesnt make sense. but packet that would cost £1 or less here can be $10-20 there.
It's even more odd in Canada. They're allowed to have adverts for prescription meds, BUT they're not allowed to say what it is for. So, you see these ridiculous adverts where they have people saying how great this drug is, then it just says "ask your doctor about xxx". They can't even hint at what it is trying to cure.Weird.
One thing I find really odd in the US is they have adverts for prescription meds. I’m all for awareness but adverts isn’t the way in my opinion. I guess some prime time tv placement must cost and be factored into the cost of meds.
Have I understood this right ?It's even more odd in Canada. They're allowed to have adverts for prescription meds, BUT they're not allowed to say what it is for. So, you see these ridiculous adverts where they have people saying how great this drug is, then it just says "ask your doctor about xxx". They can't even hint at what it is trying to cure.
I think the idea is to get people to search for the product on Google. I'm not sure how often that translates to people pestering their doctor about it. It must work to some extent, otherwise they wouldn't bother. I do find it a bit strange in a country with free public healthcare though. I can only assume they are US drug companies trying to push their overpriced products to the Canadian market.Have I understood this right ?
A successful advertising campaign is one that gets people to hassle their doctor to prescribe them drugs even though they don't know what they are intended to cure
Labour would negotiate. That’s the point.BBC news reported that Labour admitted they wouldn't be able to meet the pay demands if in power but they would talk about it. They like stoking the fire though
My favourite post of the day, the month and quite possibly the yearBBC news reported that Labour admitted they wouldn't be able to meet the pay demands if in power but they would talk about it. They like stoking the fire though
Isn't it Corbyn's fault?Labour would negotiate. That’s the point.
What Tory’s do is refuse to engage, allow the strikes to happen and then stir up public hatred toward the people striking. Divide and conquer. It’s how they operate. And they’ll keep operating like that because… people believe it.
Still, let’s point the finger at a party that hasn’t been in power for 13 years. They’re bound to be to blame
Ramsey MacDonald.Isn't it Corbyn's fault?
Yeah, Barclay was on the TV this morning saying if they give nurses increased pay how do they clear the backlog. Given the number of nurses leaving the NHS or thinking of leaving in the near future, I’d have thought the first thing you’d need to look at when trying to clear the backlog is to ensure staffing is sustainable and safe.Labour would negotiate. That’s the point.
What Tory’s do is refuse to engage, allow the strikes to happen and then stir up public hatred toward the people striking. Divide and conquer. It’s how they operate. And they’ll keep operating like that because… people believe it.
Still, let’s point the finger at a party that hasn’t been in power for 13 years. They’re bound to be to blame
heard Streeting saying this, thought i mis-heard. he seems to be saying he would talk, but no improved pay? does sound like stoking a fire, though i'm often dismayed why ministers wont simply give the unions the audience they think so important.BBC news reported that Labour admitted they wouldn't be able to meet the pay demands if in power but they would talk about it. They like stoking the fire though
Sure, but if their pay demands are met, they'll go back to work.More to it than that, see my other post.
Your link confirms that
“We’re defending our profession and our patients. We’ve had enough of being taken for granted and being unable to provide the care patients deserve”.