Seagull Steve
SWC
<mod: deleted abuse>
I find that both offensive, and downright f***ing childish, go try and frighten somebody else keyboard warrior.
Last edited by a moderator:
<mod: deleted abuse>
Don't rise to it Steve....forgive them them as they know what they do!....something like that ......I find that both offensive, and downright f***ing childish, go try and frighten somebody else keyboard warrior.
Yes. It's up to the family to decide how the car should be used.
A 3 year-old child can receive the higher rate of the mobility component of DLA and qualify for a Motability car - as the government's website makes clear:-However the claimant,cant drive but his father does and uses the car for work.
Yes. It's up to the family to decide how the car should be used.
That is morally wrong,....imo.
Sent from my wardrobe whilst watching Susannah Reid and Sian Williams enjoy a clam sandwich.
How many extra civil servants would you be prepared to pay for to ensure that 560,000 cars were only driven in accordance with your idea of what is morally right?That is morally wrong,....imo.
That is morally wrong,....imo.My wife has a motability car but she is no longer able to drive herself so I am the named driver on the insurance. She is often bedridden.
Is it wrong that I should be able to do the shopping without her present, or that I should use the car to go to the doctor's or the gym to maintain my physical wellbeing so that I can act as her carer (and save the government a small fortune in so doing)? When I do the occasional day's "work" in an honorary role which helps me to retain a sense of self-respect and mental well being having retired early to care for her, is it wrong that I should use the car? In each of these instances she is demonstrably a beneficiary. At a cost to us of £200 a month I think the motability scheme represents good value but it is by no means a "freebie" and as we lease the car with our own money it doesn't seem unreasonable that we decide how we should use it. We could (indeed we used to) run an old banger for less and spend what we save on other needs. The scheme isn't subsidised by the taxpayer. Lease terms are negotiated on the strength of combined spending power. Many manufacturer's offer similar terms to private leasees.
On the other issue, I only use her Blue Badge when she is in the car or if I'm dropping her at the hairdressers or whatever - the rules on that are quite different and rightly so although it is often the case that warden's will book you even when displaying a badge. It isn't a licence to park just anywhere by any means but it is widely abused. I strongly recommend everyone to do what I do and report people who are clearly flouting it to the local authority who are responsible for managing the issue of blue badges.
BTW - as the car is hers she gets to choose and accessorise it with the result that we have a car that looks like a bumble bee on heat (bright yellow with a black roof and matching internal "touches") and has plastic eyelashes with diamante trim around the headlamps - personally I think I deserve a frigging medal for just getting behind the wheel
However the claimant,cant drive but his father does and uses the car for work.
That is morally wrong,....imo.My wife has a motability car but she is no longer able to drive herself so I am the named driver on the insurance. She is often bedridden.
Is it wrong that I should be able to do the shopping without her present, or that I should use the car to go to the doctor's or the gym to maintain my physical wellbeing so that I can act as her carer (and save the government a small fortune in so doing)? When I do the occasional day's "work" in an honorary role which helps me to retain a sense of self-respect and mental well being having retired early to care for her, is it wrong that I should use the car? In each of these instances she is demonstrably a beneficiary. At a cost to us of £200 a month I think the motability scheme represents good value but it is by no means a "freebie" and as we lease the car with our own money it doesn't seem unreasonable that we decide how we should use it. We could (indeed we used to) run an old banger for less and spend what we save on other needs. The scheme isn't subsidised by the taxpayer. Lease terms are negotiated on the strength of combined spending power. Many manufacturer's offer similar terms to private leasees.
On the other issue, I only use her Blue Badge when she is in the car or if I'm dropping her at the hairdressers or whatever - the rules on that are quite different and rightly so although it is often the case that warden's will book you even when displaying a badge. It isn't a licence to park just anywhere by any means but it is widely abused. I strongly recommend everyone to do what I do and report people who are clearly flouting it to the local authority who are responsible for managing the issue of blue badges.
BTW - as the car is hers she gets to choose and accessorise it with the result that we have a car that looks like a bumble bee on heat (bright yellow with a black roof and matching internal "touches") and has plastic eyelashes with diamante trim around the headlamps - personally I think I deserve a frigging medal for just getting behind the wheel
Exactly !!!
My mrs can't drive, her car has my private plate on and in her eyes is my "company car" seeing as we could no longer afford to run my car after I left £30k job to be her full time carer and my "wages" are a stonking £32.50 a week. I neither see your point or your problem tbh - is it that he's turned up to work recently and you've got a touch of the green eyed monster maybe?
What was the relevance of you stating "her car has my private plate" ?
So a carer should not be able to use the car if the disabled person is not in it ?
What if the reason I have not been able to get food shopping ect is because I have not been able to leave my sick sons side for a week.... Is that allowed or do I have to get a carer to work overtime while I get on a bus ?
Oh but wait. I don't have time to get the bus into town & back as my other children finish school in an hour.
It's little things like this that somebody who is not a full time carer would not think of (understandably fair enough) but should i have to buy another car seeing as I'm already renting this one ?
That is one simple example but I'm telling you.... There are a thousand & one other reasons that a person might need to use the car without the disabled person being it that actually does help the disabled person aswell as their family who for many reasons may be struggling & would otherwise be housebound or unable to do the things that most people take for granted
The hire agreement does state not to be used for racing and business use.