Baldseagull
Well-known member
I get that but just because we seem to have an ethical chairman, doesn't mean others do. That is the whole crux of my point.
Yes, I agree there is the potential for problems, but you have said we cannot take the moral high ground when other owners use financial doping etc. I think we still can because we don't exploit the situation to benefit just Brighton, or even benefit Brighton much more than USG, it is mutually beneficial, but both USG and Brighton are well down the table of big spenders in their leagues, and not bending any rules on FFP or sustainability, as far as I am aware.