I’m not sure Ferguson and Pedro are that far away from being available.I agree.
But I guess everyone isn't fit
Welbeck is a nailed on starter and his fitness record has been terrific since he's been with us
Pedro won't be back for a while
Fergson, even longer
Osman, may be able to play that position, he looked good to me, but has limited experience
O'Mahoney, even less experienced and is presumably being lined up for a loan
Enciso, not currently with the squad but could play up there, is he preferred elsewhere though?
It looks like Fab will be looking to play 2 strikers for some or all of games, that means I guess you want 4 players who can play that position. It's plausible to me that we would be reluctant to sell while we wait for some sort of definite prognosis on Pedro and Ferguson
Agree with the statement about Feguson, being thenknown factor.The huge unknown in all this is Evan - if he can get back to even 95% of where he was pre-injury/illness then with no Europe we don't need too much more than him and Welbeck.
I'm convinced Undav will leave, but on the club's terms. My 'hunch' is £25m in a payment schedule that we want. Let's see how he performs with a 'record signing' tag around his neck rather than 'on loan'. Fans' patience/expectations tend to change in those circumstances.
He wasn't here last season so we can hardly miss him can we?
Yeah, I watched the player with the best minutes to goal ratio during our time in the PL despite struggling mentally for large parts of the season.Made a big impact there then. I guess you never watched what you were seeing of the player while he was at the Albion then?
Because he was struggling with living in England and had made it clear the whole time he was here?Wonder why they shipped him out. Ooh, tricky one for the hard of thinking
It's not a crime to be objective shirley? Even on NSCYeah, I watched the player with the best minutes to goal ratio during our time in the PL despite struggling mentally for large parts of the season.
Because he was struggling with living in England and had made it clear the whole time he was here?
You don't help yourself with such idiotic comments.
You're not being objective though, you're sharing an opinion whilst treating it as fact.It's not a crime to be objective shirley? Even on NSC
Game of opinions yada yada. Tho he was slow and lardy. Maupay MinusYou're not being objective though, you're sharing an opinion whilst treating it as fact.
The facts show he was a very good goal scorer in his limited minutes last season and he left not because of performance but personal reasons.
That seems optimistic but I’ll happily take it!I’m not sure Ferguson and Pedro are that far away from being available.
I’m led to believe Pedro back for QPR game and Ferguson likely to be back in time for the start of the season.
Think we’ve been here beforeCouple of eye-catching goals don't disguise the fact that he was lardy and slow
Maybe TB is aware of Undav’s outbursts and is just pissing him offIf a player did that to me on FM he'd be sent to double endurance training daily and not even playing with the youth team or reserves. If this is true make him train solo don't want the youth teams thinking this sort of behaviour gets them anywhere.
That report is from the Stuttgart equivalent of the Argus. They are just playing to their audience, probably based on some vague gossip that has been exaggerated.I’m sceptical. If what is reported in this tweet was true, then there’s no way that we’d have turned down that 25m offered.
So, Pedro wasn't fit enough to go to Tokyo, but he'll be back for the PSF a few days after the team returns?I’m not sure Ferguson and Pedro are that far away from being available.
I’m led to believe Pedro back for QPR game and Ferguson likely to be back in time for the start of the season.
I’m sceptical. If what is reported in this tweet was true, then there’s no way that we’d have turned down that 25m offered.
Is there anything more tedious than people presenting what is clearly a subjective position as being "objective" and using this supposed objectivity as a basis to berate anyone with a different view as stupid?It's not a crime to be objective shirley? Even on NSC
Especially when I actually bought statistics to it, something objective.Is there anything more tedious than people presenting what is clearly a subjective position as being "objective" and using this supposed objectivity as a basis to berate anyone with a different view as stupid?