Tony Blair lie.
I think the difference is, most of us were surprised when Blair was lying,now, most of us are surprised when Johnson isn’t.
Tony Blair lie.
The only way to defend the indefensible, when backed into a corner, is to claim 'they're all the same' and that you don't participate - WATFORD zero
Toute nation a le gouvernement qu'elle mérite - Joseph de Maistre
I'll wait for the edited version before reading.
They no doubt have all lied at some point.All politicians are liars. It's what they do.
He's right though - "they're all the same" is an absolute crock of shit and only someone who would choose a bumbling immoral lying idiot running the country purely because he is a Tory and not Labour would ever have the front to even say as much.
They absolutely are NOT "all the same". Johnson is just f**king awful.
Absolute rubbish. How anyone can accuse someone like Dennis Skinner of "self serving glory" is beyond me. Even Jeremy Corbyn - he spent his entire career making enemies of his own front bench before ludicrously being parachuted into it himself.I disagree, The common cause is not our welfare, safety, development etc etc, it's self serving glory.
Everyday we hear of MPs from all sides claiming £2.88 for a box of paper clips here or £2,500 for a new MacBook Air with surround sound gubbins for their home office.
Self sacrifice, it's the only way to get the electorate onside again.
Absolute rubbish. How anyone can accuse someone like Dennis Skinner of "self serving glory" is beyond me. Even Jeremy Corbyn - he spent his entire career making enemies of his own front bench before ludicrously being parachuted into it himself.
As for expenses - this is trivial. The worst culprits were dealt with, they don't get away with expense fiddles and yet we still have 650 MPs.
The bottom line is that you only say this because you support a properly crap, untrustworthy, Tory PM over anyone remotely left wing and you want to feel better about it.
I'm not using them as role models. I am disputing your crap assertion that they're all the same and are in fact just self-serving. Those are examples of clearly don't fit your stupid narrative.Utter claptrap.
Using Skinner and Corbyn as role models is odd at best. As for Johnson, I've never voted Tory in my life.
The problem is when a discussion turns into 'you think this, and you're wrong. I'm right'.
I'd have to disagree with that. We've had some principled politicians of all hues down the years, we really have. Our politicians have actually been the envy of similar nations. You only need to look across the water at France to see evidence of this - they've had absolute corrupt toe rags for years - so bad that the FN gained a foot hold.
It is absolutely laughable that Biggums sees fit to compare Blair to Johnson. When Johnson opens his mouth and it's not a lie, it's complete gibberish. The same cannot be said for Blair. Or Major. Or Thatcher. Or even David Cameron. These people had policies and while they weren't always transparent, you knew what the policy was. Johnson is just inept in every way, including his blatant lying.
I don't entirely blame an ignorant electorate that still look at cuddly fat Boris as if he's a mate and use Labour whataboutery at every turn to excuse appalling Tory leadership. I blame the local Tory constituent offices themselves for purging dissenting but principled people and replacing them with clueless sheep. The result is this: a govt that lies and blusters through everything, and then forces through shit laws and blames everyone else for it. This is truly the worst PM and government I have ever lived through and hope I ever see again.
I'm not using them as role models. I am disputing your crap assertion that they're all the same and are in fact just self-serving. Those are examples of clearly don't fit your stupid narrative.
I don't believe you've never voted Tory. You're forever critical of Labour on here and I've seen you defending Johnson. This "they're all the same" narrative is a good example of that when it's so obviously not true.
Not necessarily, but anyone. Without Dawn Butler today people wouldn’t be talking so bluntly about Boris Johnson the liar anywhere outside left-wing Twitter.
Great thread
The NSC Clownerati shocked that politicians sometimes lie
Naive fools a plenty
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The only way to defend the indefensible, when backed into a corner, is to claim 'they're all the same' and that you don't participate - WATFORD zeroThey're all the bloody same. Liars and noses in the trough.
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
Toute nation a le gouvernement qu'elle mérite - Joseph de Maistre
Naive fools a plenty
A nobody on the internet patronizingly telling a highly successful politician of many years standing what she 'needs to learn'
You sound ridiculous.
Anyway, my view is that Johnson was found to have deliberatelly lied, by the highest court in the country to the Commons, to the Citizens of the UK and to the Queen. So she's on very solid ground. She has stated clearly and publicly what everyone knows to be true but the current, spineless, opposition leaders don't have the balls to say.
Ducking and diving, avoiding answering questions and the use of weasel words by politicians have been normal for a long time in this country. But the Cummings/Johnson strategy of deliberately and knowingly using outright lies to gain and hold on to power and then the refusing to take accountability when caught out has been a worrying shift in tactics and there is a danger we have all become so cynical that it that it no longer raises the anger it would have done in the past. So Dawn Butler has highlighted this deliberately and provocatively. And it has worked just fine.
A clever move by a clever woman.
Edit: For purpose of accuracy, it was the Scottish Court of Sessions that was explicit that Johnson lied. The Supreme Court stopped short of saying that explicitly, but made it clear that they did not believe the reasons he gave for prorogation of parliament and that 'no justification for taking action with such an extreme effect has been put before the court' - which is effectively accusing him of lying.