Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Danny Welbeck, should we? [18/10: we did - one year deal] - *** NEW ONE YEAR DEAL ***









Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,779
GOSBTS
We’re getting to that stage where options are very very limited. We are a little desperate.

If we want back-up for Connolly & Maupay getting injured or suspended, I’d prefer Wellbeck getting the nod ahead of Zeqiri (who has only been tested against teams on the same level as Crawley Town).

If you don’t think we need back-up, fair enough. That seems to be the club line.

If we are desperate, we would have signed someone in the transfer window, not signing one now in my opinion
 




Insel affe

HellBilly
Feb 23, 2009
24,331
Brighton factually.....
@£100k a week no wonder he was released, we won't pay that end of thread.

Actually has Palace, Newcastle or Leeds written all over it
 




zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,786
Sussex, by the sea
It's also wrong. He's scored 72 goals at club level and 16 at international level.

As well as suffering from unfortunate injuries, he has also been played out wide a lot too.

IF his salary expectations were sensible and he passed the NDP why wouldn't we consider him. GP and the team may be able to get something from him.

It won't happen, but I don't get the negativity about players who have not achieved inter gallactic status due to vcircumstances beyond their control.

Unlike Andone for example who dry humped himself. . . . and ticked every box of the NDP in 5 seconds flat
 




crodonilson

He/Him
Jan 17, 2005
14,062
Lyme Regis
Welbeck, or 'Welbz' as he's affectionately know would be a fantastic signing on a free. It's his injuries that are the reason why we might have a sniff of signing him instead one of the truly big British or European clubs.
 






Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
16,027
Not for me, Clive.
 


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,452
Sussex
not particularly but as we have 2 strikers , its better than nothing.

Our striking bench on sat was a bit shit house . Anyone would do
 






Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
23,661
Brighton
If we are desperate, we would have signed someone in the transfer window, not signing one now in my opinion

I think we’ll go again in January for the young £20m+ striker. Conditions not right in this window.

In the meantime we are probably after a free transfer like Lallana to get us to January.

We’re still in a transfer window of sorts, Pukki, Deeney or Wellbeck seem like ideal squad players who could do a job if Maupay and Connolly can’t play or perhaps offer something different against teams like Everton.
 


pornomagboy

wake me up before you gogo who needs potter when
May 16, 2006
6,089
peacehaven
That suggests a deal has been struck, otherwise they'd likely be announcing that they're releasing him.
does Bozza know something we don't

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 




Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,955
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
initially I was a No to Welbeck, but the more I think about it the more it would not be a bad move. I have no idea how fit he is currently though..
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,955
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
not particularly but as we have 2 strikers , its better than nothing.

Our striking bench on sat was a bit shit house . Anyone would do

Anyone would do is a bit mean I would suggest... 40 odd England caps and 16 goals... would signing him be any different to Lallana... and he's only 29 still....
 




Doonhamer7

Well-known member
Jun 17, 2016
1,453
Sign him on an Andy Carroll type contract, low base pay with additional for available, bench and games. Give a small release fee and it’s a win win contract
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
aside wages i cant understand why anyone would be against this. obviously have a lot of faith in our current forwards.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here