"Its a long term plan".
Till someone waves a bunch of notes caked in blood in front of your face.
I detest the Saudis as much as anyone (and am a big supporter of Israel) but I don't think that is a fair take.
I can understand people campaigining vigorously to change the rules of football governance to keep people like this out of football. Any such changes could have some collateral, of course, with the owners of ManU, Chelsea, Leicester, ManCity and others all being required to disinvest and bugger off. However, that's all fine.
But where are the protests? Only Palace had a weedy banner up? I don't see the league managers' association, the players' union, the Labour party, the Liberals, the Greens and the traditional protesters, veterans of the poll tax riots, etc, all marching up and down Barrack Road and Strawberry Place demanding that the Saudis go, and go now.
"Notes caked in blood" just made me laugh. Yes I know what the Saudis have done, but (all the above, and more).
Calling Thatcher 'Milk Snatcher' certainly cheered me up when I was steeped in loathing for the old witch, but it was hubris, and it didn't hurry up her demise. Changing all this (like removing the tories) will require people being much smarter. Changing the rules of club ownership is necessary. But....I don't see any appetite for change .
I personally wouldn't have even spoken to the Saudis if offered a job at Newcastle, but I'm peculiar so my imperatives are irrelevant. I just can't see how accepting a legal job when offered by a legal organization warrants 'blood money' accusations, though. I would imagine supporters of other clubs, browsing NSC would be laughing at us, with the laughter getting louder as the outrage becomes increasingly flamboyant.
Anyway, they may still go down then we can all laugh at them. . . for one season.