dougdeep
New member
Are the Germans going to attend?
Are the Germans going to attend?
Are the Germans going to attend?
I've found to be quite balanced really. There is an admittedly American slant to some of it but, as historical record, that's fair enough; they did come in and make a massive difference to the outcome of the conflict. Them and the Russians.
He doesn't need to, we've got them here. As an aside , I bought a French army rifle on eBay yesterday......................never been fired, only dropped onceYou should visit France and see the war memorials in every village from the First World war. There were thousands upon thousands that were lost. The German invasion was just 20 years later, so it's unsurprising that they felt it was easier to accept Nazi rule. They had see the total devastation that had been wreaked in other countries before them.
Then read about the French resistance and the help they gave to Jewish people, and escaping prisoners of war.
As someone else has said, it's far to simplistic to say they rolled over.
Mr Ambrose is American don't forget.
Below is a quote from an American News website exploding the D-Day myths, it makes interesting reading:
"1. MYTH: D-Day was predominantly an American operation
REALITY: For many people, D-Day is defined by the bloodshed at Omaha -- the codename for one of the five beaches where Allied forces landed -- and the American airborne drops. Even in Germany, the perception is still that D-Day was a largely American show; in the recent German TV mini-series, "Generation War," there was a reference to the "American landings" in France.
But despite "Band of Brothers," despite "Saving Private Ryan," despite those 11 photographs taken by Robert Capa in the swell on that morning of June 6 1944, D-Day was not a predominantly American effort. Rather, it was an Allied effort with, if anything, Britain taking the lead. Yes, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the supreme Allied commander, was American, but his deputy, Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Tedder was British, as were all three service chiefs. Air Marshal Sir Arthur "Mary" Coningham, commander of the tactical air forces, was also British. The plan for Operation Overlord -- as D-Day was codenamed -- was largely that of Gen. Bernard Montgomery, the land force commander. The Royal Navy had overall responsibility for Operation Neptune, the naval plan. Of the 1,213 warships involved, 200 were American and 892 were British; of the 4,126 landing craft involved, 805 were American and 3,261 were British.
Remembering D-Day through music Indeed, 31% of all U.S. supplies used during D-Day came directly from Britain, while two-thirds of the 12,000 aircraft involved were also British, as were two-thirds of those that landed in occupied France. Despite the initial slaughter at Omaha, casualties across the American and British beaches were much the same. This is not to belittle the U.S. effort but rather to add context and a wider, 360-degree view. History needs to teach as well as entertain."
Oh certainly, there's no doubt that the AEF was a joint effort and not a solo US attack.
My point was more along the lines of pointing out that, to the war in general, the Americans had a massive impact on the outcome and, to my view, things may very well have been quite different had they not gotten involved when they did.
Oh certainly, there's no doubt that the AEF was a joint effort and not a solo US attack.
My point was more along the lines of pointing out that, to the war in general, the Americans had a massive impact on the outcome and, to my view, things may very well have been quite different had they not gotten involved when they did.
Or perhaps might have been different if they had got involved sometime earlier.....
I watched the guy who had parachuted in on D Day o another jump with the paras. The respect they showed to someone who had done it back then at the age of only 19 made me choke. Especially when he was stood up and had the harness removed, first thing he did was put his red beret on! Amazing people.
Or perhaps might have been different if they had got involved sometime earlier.....
Oh certainly, there's no doubt that the AEF was a joint effort and not a solo US attack.
My point was more along the lines of pointing out that, to the war in general, the Americans had a massive impact on the outcome and, to my view, things may very well have been quite different had they not gotten involved when they did.