Wellesley
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2013
- 4,973
1. Wrong
2. Wrong
I completely disagree.
If you'd have told the average Brighton fan at the start of this season we'd get a £13 million deal for Burn, most would have taken it there and then (or just laughed at you). With Cucurella's arrival on the left he'd just become third choice left back who'd be fighting Duffy for a centre back spot if we got an injury to one of our starting CBs. Yes, he had several good games at centre back after that but he also had a couple of huge mistakes earlier in the season and still looks like he has a ricket in him. I know that Newcastle were playing a City side who needed to be redeemed yesterday but Burn made an error that he only just recovered from inside the first 10 minutes while the third goal was collectively awful defending.
Secondly it genuinely is his boyhood club so denying him the opportunity would have left us with a sulking, unhappy camper around the place.
It's a deal that suited everyone and to play it any other way is bizarre.
I'm late to the thread but I'm here to heap my praise on Cucurella as well. That guy has absulutely worked his tail off for the club the entire season--his motor never quits, and every ball he plays has positive intent. I'm so happy for him. And what a rocket into the roof of the net--very fitting.
I'm not sure what to make of the Dan Burn sale. His departure coincided with the worst six-game run of the season for the club (along with the Webster injury and whatever was going on with Bissouma after the African Cup; tired?). Burn certainly fit the earnest hard-working character you like to have on your side, and I wonder if he improved more under Potter than many give him credit for.
If you had to sell either Lamptey or Cucurella?
No other club in prem would of sold a player that cheap with 17 months left on contract . The fact he wanted to go and play is irrelevant
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Southampton sold Vestergaard to Leicester for a similar amount (£15m - 1 year left) in the summer. (Similar age , centre back ) . They’d bought him for £22m.
Bollox . A player is sold at a value based on ability performance etc at time of sale not what he did or didn’t do 6 months ago too many examples to type
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah that's probably the reason, but it's lazy journalism because that takes no account of how the club is run.Probably because we gave away Dan Burn for peanuts
If Cucurella won PotS, how likely is it that Spain might look at him seriously with a view to a World Cup place? We've already got Sanchez who is in the Spain squad, so you'd think Spanish national team scouts must be keeping tabs on Cucurella too.
I bet they're more open him getting a chance than the England clowns who never look beyond the big 6 and thus ensure we end up with shite like Maguire and Winks despite them being absolute dross.
Southampton sold Vestergaard to Leicester for a similar amount (£15m - 1 year left) in the summer. (Similar age , centre back ) . They’d bought him for £22m.
If Cucurella won PotS, how likely is it that Spain might look at him seriously with a view to a World Cup place? We've already got Sanchez who is in the Spain squad, so you'd think Spanish national team scouts must be keeping tabs on Cucurella too.
I bet they're more open him getting a chance than the England clowns who never look beyond the big 6 and thus ensure we end up with shite like Maguire and Winks despite them being absolute dross.