The Fits
Well-known member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 10,106
Where on earth do they get this nonsense from? It just makes sites like these seem so utterly clueless.
The guy is CL level and heading for big things. Clearly loves the club and enjoying his time here I think he will stay next season then the game is up and he will go for top money.
Imagine if in potters system we had Bruno in his prime on the right and Cucurella on the left
A flair Spanish fullback is now as quintessentially Brighton as Seagulls nicking chips, Rock, 1.5 piers, Muesli Mountain, Tattoos, Dirty weekends, Beards, elderly skateboarders, The Pavilion and Duke's Mound
And general everyday grime and filth.
Written by a deluded Spurs fan is their vain hope that it will happen for that figure, not realising who he is dealing with in TB and thinks that if we sold BDB to Toon for a tenner, we'll do the same to Spurs should they come calling.
Two words. Not those two.
These two:
1) Ben
2) White
This is great....[video]https://www.brightonandhovealbion.com/my-albion-tv/videos/2608255/cucurella-dunky-shouts-at-me-a-lot/[/video]
Is Dunk standing on a box or is Cucurella in a hole ?
Probably because we gave away Dan Burn for peanuts
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just don't understand how anyone with any hope of being a journalist would think of writing that. Why on earth would we sell our Player of the Season, who has 4 years left on his contract, for a £2m profit? Utterly baffling "report"
We bought Dan for an undisclosed fee in the region of £3.2 million and sold him, at the age of 29, with 7 months left on his contract, for about 4 times that. It gave the player the opportunity to play for his boyhood club and it was the decent thing to do for a good servant of the club. However, there is no way that Tony Bloom wouldn't have ensured that we got every possible penny out of Newcastle. It was annoying that his good run of form coincided with our dip, but we didn't sell him for peanuts. If you use the same equation to value Cucurella. i.e. 4 times the price we paid for him for every seven months left on his contract, we'd be valuing him at over £400 million. I suppose we could overlook adjusting up further for the age difference as we wouldn't have to give Wigan a percentage.
Burn had 17 months left on his contract, not seven.
Still not a bad deal.
Burn had 17 months left on his contract, not seven.
Still not a bad deal.
No other club in prem would of sold a player that cheap with 17 months left on contract . The fact he wanted to go and play is irrelevant
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No other club in prem would of sold a player that cheap with 17 months left on contract . The fact he wanted to go and play is irrelevant
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I completely disagree.
If you'd have told the average Brighton fan at the start of this season we'd get a £13 million deal for Burn, most would have taken it there and then (or just laughed at you). With Cucurella's arrival on the left he'd just become third choice left back who'd be fighting Duffy for a centre back spot if we got an injury to one of our starting CBs. Yes, he had several good games at centre back after that but he also had a couple of huge mistakes earlier in the season and still looks like he has a ricket in him. I know that Newcastle were playing a City side who needed to be redeemed yesterday but Burn made an error that he only just recovered from inside the first 10 minutes while the third goal was collectively awful defending.
Secondly it genuinely is his boyhood club so denying him the opportunity would have left us with a sulking, unhappy camper around the place.
It's a deal that suited everyone and to play it any other way is bizarre.