Raleigh Chopper
New member
Is it the Wests fault?
No.
Fred and Rose carried out some awful crimes but you can't blame them for that.
Is it the Wests fault?
People from poor and troubled backgrounds are more likely to commit crimes.
It's a wealth problem, not one of race or nationality.
Oh no! Don't go bringing facts into the discussion, you'll only confuse things
Wouldn't happen in Germany
People from poor and troubled backgrounds are more likely to commit crimes.
It's a wealth problem, not one of race or nationality.
Well it is a wealth problem but not what you are suggesting.
There is far more greed, fraud, theft, corruption and downright skullduggery at the higher echelons of society than lower down the scale. Our whole financial system is riddled with criminal activity on a massive scale.The political world is scarred by the most corrupt body to ever exist ( the EU ) and the legal world relies on deception to make millions. In other walks of life, heads of governing bodies feather their already sumptuous nests with huge backhanders whilst certain political leaders carry out heinous crimes whilst bankrupting their own people at the same time.
To suggest that the disadvantaged carry out the majority of crime is greatly disrespectful to millions of people who carry out their lives with honesty and dignity and as law abiding citizens. Power corrupts and those feeding at the top end of the trough just get more powerful, more wealthy, whilst riding roughshod over the rest of us.
Study history. Its always been like this. Except now its worse. There is a massive divide and its getting wider. People trot out out this stereotypical garbage about the downtrodden blacks and the white underclass. Its all rubbish. Open your eyes and see where the real crime is.
They are laughing at us while they rip us off and we just all sit back and let it happen.
Yes and no, I think there is a degree and it's difficult to say all crimes are because of economic determinism. If someone nicks a loaf of bread to feed a family, then economic determinism is a valid argument. If someone kicks in someone's head in because they were bored, that is not because of their background.
There has to be a degree of rationality involved for economic determinism to be valid.
You write that like its fact but it's not, it's just another opinion. He isn't specifically talking about economically determined crimes, he's talking about behaviour as a consequence of economic circumstance. If all one knows is how to steal, fight and harm, that is what they are most likely to carry on doing.
Are you suggesting all crime is because of someone being poor ?
Judging by the some of the comments a few months ago about " grasses", do I take it that if anyone knows these gentlemen, and takes it upon him/ herself to ring the filth and dob them in, are they grasses or a concerned citizen?
I never understand this term grass!
You write that like its fact but it's not, it's just another opinion. He isn't specifically talking about economically determined crimes, he's talking about behaviour as a consequence of economic circumstance.
I would say concerned citizen.
Disregarding the lazy generalisation, a curious episode to pick your view of how crime pans out.
I mostly disagreed with this partSo he's talking about people who commit crime because of economic consequences?
Which is economic determinism. I used to the theft of food as an example. That is very clear.
But continue.
There has to be a degree of rationality involved for economic determinism to be valid.
People from poor and troubled backgrounds are more likely to commit crimes.
It's a wealth problem, not one of race or nationality.