Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Palace] #cpfc



Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319




Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
Why would he let them terminate the contract?
3 years of anything like £170k says all you need to about them…!

The lad has flourished since though… 😬

IMG_7841.png
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
When the Albion were promoted the club owed TB £190m and this had increased to £406m by 2022, so that’s £216m from Sir Tony since reaching the PL, of which about £50m is infrastructure spend on property.
Your Mrs’ boots are mint 🙌
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
When the Albion were promoted the club owed TB £190m and this had increased to £406m by 2022, so that’s £216m from Sir Tony since reaching the PL, of which about £50m is infrastructure spend on property.
So £166m on players - covered by Moises and Cucu alone - let alone the rest (yes wages etc too of course but still…)
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
When the Albion were promoted the club owed TB £190m and this had increased to £406m by 2022, so that’s £216m from Sir Tony since reaching the PL, of which about £50m is infrastructure spend on property.
Thank you.

How does that compare with Palace's net spending?

(and thank you for correctly addressing Sir Tony)
 




Crispy Ambulance

Well-known member
May 27, 2010
2,596
Burgess Hill
3 years of anything like £170k says all you need to about them…!

The lad has flourished since though… 😬

View attachment 173038
I saw him play (and score) for Luzern in a 2-1 defeat at FC Zurich back in March. He was the best player on the park for 70 mins or so but faded which enabled FCZ to nick the win. I think he’s still playing regularly for them this season too.
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
I saw him play (and score) for Luzern in a 2-1 defeat at FC Zurich back in March. He was the best player on the park for 70 mins or so but faded which enabled FCZ to nick the win. I think he’s still playing regularly for them this season too.
Stats seem good there tbf but it is the Swiss league…
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,089
Goldstone
Is the phrase ‘payable on demand’ at all significant? Does that essentially mean TB can decide to take as much or as little back each year?
Yes, the clubs assets are essentially his
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,000
Pattknull med Haksprut
As requested, here is a comparison of the relative finances of both the Albion and Palace in the Premier League per the accounts (so does not show sales of Cucurella, Caicedo et) up to 30 June 2022.

Income is almost identical, Palace £740m and Albion £736m

1705634933381.png


Wages are the most significant cost. Here Palace are ahead by £117 million over five years.

1705635221693.png


1705635449444.png


In the Beaky v PBOBE battle Paul Barber has earned (and is worth every cent) of £1.8m more than Parish, although Parish earns extra money from renting out one of his properties in Central London to Palace, presumably to avoid having to show potential sponsors, players etc Croydon.

1705635634465.png


Palace have lost £205m in the last five years compared to the Albion's £162m

1705635879275.png


These losses are mitigated by either player sales or owner/third party funding.

Palace's sale profits are £59m (mostly from AWB) and Albion's £77m (White, BDB) althogh expect this to rise substantially.

1705636194098.png


In terms of player signings, Palace have spent £201m and Albion £291m

1705636370153.png


When it comes to funding, Palace owners have lent the club through a variety of instruments £141m and Sir Tony has put in £216m

1705637022934.png
 
Last edited:




jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,486
Especially having had the upper hand over us for something in region of 25 years.

Seeing us disrupting the big 6 and qualifying for Europe, all whilst turning a large profit to enable continued investment must be horrendous, especially as the best-case scenario for them is to continue treading water in the lower half of the PL doing just enough to survive year after year.
I think what will really hurt is all the plaudits we’ve had in recent years about our ownership/transfer business and club model. Must drive them nuts that were constantly in the mainstream press being praised for the brilliance of our ownership and football, yet they only pop up when “in crisis”
 


Couldn't Be Hyypia

We've come a long long way together
NSC Patron
Nov 12, 2006
16,712
Near Dorchester, Dorset
As requested, here is a comparison of the relative finances of both the Albion and Palace per the accounts (so does not show sales of Cucurella, Caicedo et) up to 30 June 2022.

Income is almost identical, Palace £740m and Albion £736m

View attachment 173045

Wages are the most significant cost. Here Palace are ahead by £117 million over five years.

View attachment 173046

View attachment 173047

In the Beaky v PBOBE battle Paul Barber has earned (and is worth every cent) of £1.8m more than Parish, although Parish earns extra money from renting out one of his properties in Central London to Palace, presumably to avoid having to show potential sponsors, players etc Croydon.

View attachment 173048

Palace have lost £205m in the last five years compared to the Albion's £162m

View attachment 173049

These losses are mitigated by either player sales or owner/third party funding.

Palace's sale profits are £59m (mostly from AWB) and Albion's £77m (White, BDB) althogh expect this to rise substantially.

View attachment 173050

In terms of player signings, Palace have spent £201m and Albion £291m

View attachment 173051

When it comes to funding, Palace owners have lent the club through a variety of instruments £141m and Sir Tony has put in £216m

View attachment 173052
Thanks El Pres.

Presumably if we looked at the five years before these, Palace player purchases would be higher since it would cover their early Prem days?
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,513
Burgess Hill
Thanks El Pres.

Presumably if we looked at the five years before these, Palace player purchases would be higher since it would cover their early Prem days?
……although likely our losses would be higher as we chased promotion and didn’t have PL income. Presumably interest costs are significantly different- don’t think Sir T takes anything whereas Palace are paying market rates ?
 






Milano

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2012
3,922
Sussex but not by the sea
I would expect that income over the last 18 months we have raced away from them. Finishing 6th, two good cup runs (QF & SF) and now Europa League income. Then throw in the ~£200m in player sales in the last 2 windows.
They’re currently wiping away our dust, and will be for the foreseeable…..and they know it.
 


jakarta

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
15,738
Sullington
First game of the weekend away vs. Arsenal. With Forest & Brentford next, both of whom could put them down a further place...
 






Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
As requested, here is a comparison of the relative finances of both the Albion and Palace per the accounts (so does not show sales of Cucurella, Caicedo et) up to 30 June 2022.

Income is almost identical, Palace £740m and Albion £736m

View attachment 173045

Wages are the most significant cost. Here Palace are ahead by £117 million over five years.

View attachment 173046

View attachment 173047

In the Beaky v PBOBE battle Paul Barber has earned (and is worth every cent) of £1.8m more than Parish, although Parish earns extra money from renting out one of his properties in Central London to Palace, presumably to avoid having to show potential sponsors, players etc Croydon.

View attachment 173048

Palace have lost £205m in the last five years compared to the Albion's £162m

View attachment 173049

These losses are mitigated by either player sales or owner/third party funding.

Palace's sale profits are £59m (mostly from AWB) and Albion's £77m (White, BDB) althogh expect this to rise substantially.

View attachment 173050

In terms of player signings, Palace have spent £201m and Albion £291m

View attachment 173051

When it comes to funding, Palace owners have lent the club through a variety of instruments £141m and Sir Tony has put in £216m

View attachment 173052
So basically, Jordan is talking out his arse…
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,921
Brighton
First game of the weekend away vs. Arsenal. With Forest & Brentford next, both of whom could put them down a further place...
Too positive a view. I think it's clear that with so many people expecting an easy Arsenal win, palace are going to sneak a win. Ah well. At least it'll keep Roy in charge a little longer.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here