Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Court case involving Albion players - the (new) only thread allowed - ALL found NOT GUILTY









Postman Pat

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2007
6,972
Coldean

Confirmed by Argus:

Four footballers accused of sexually assaulting a teenage woman are to face a second trial at the Old Bailey days before Albion could face key promotion games.

A date has been set for Albion players Lewis Dunk, Anton Rodgers and George Barker and former Seagull Steve Cook to stand trial for a second time accused of sexual assault.

A jury at the Old Bailey last week failed to reach verdicts on whether the players assaulted the young woman at the Jurys Inn in Stroudley Road, Brighton, on the night of July 16 2011.

Rodgers, Barker and Cook will also be retried for voyeurism. Dunk was found not guilty of voyeurism.

The retrial will begin on May 6 just two days after Albion’s last match of the season, but could come as the club prepares for the crucial Championship play- offs on May 11 and 16.

The four players are accused of assaulting an unconscious 19- year-old girl in a hotel room after a night out celebrating the first match at the newly-opened American Express Community Stadium.

During the first trial both Rodgers and Barker admitted exposing themselves while Dunk and Cook said they were in the room at the time but did nothing to stop their teammates.
 


Bra

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2009
1,366
patcham
The argus talking up the impact it will have on any play off games. Only Dunk is near the first team and with the addition of Upson, he is probably 4th choice now.
 






smeariestbat

New member
May 5, 2012
1,731
Post deleted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:








strings

Moving further North...
Feb 19, 2006
9,969
Barnsley
[tweet]331685515780837376[/tweet]

@CourtNewsUK: Sex assault retrial of 4 footballers including son of Liverpool boss Brendan Rodgers to start today #bhfc #afcb http://courtnewsuk.co.uk)
 










TheDuke

Well-known member
Oct 28, 2011
1,223
Arundel
Do they produce any new evidence or is it just a case of a different jury's take on what was produced before?
 


Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick








Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,027
Goldstone
She's now being referred to as the 'alleged victim' which is weird after last time.
 






nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,532
Manchester
I'd forgotten about the 3 pairs of underpants that the woman said she was wearing. Must have been a cold night!
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,027
Goldstone
They've learnt their lesson?
Last time it was explained that before a judgement is made, someone is still described as a 'victim', not an 'alleged victim', because the latter makes it sound like it is alleged that the person is the victim, but the victim may actually be someone else - which is clearly not the case.

It is confusing, because although they know the claimant in the right person, it's not been established whether a crime took place or not (so I think alleged sounds more appropriate).
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here