Thanks. I find education and potential and identifying potential fascinatng, this is the reason for my question. Whilst your daughter did most of the work, her upbringing and the support you gave was obviously a huge enabler.The teachers took the view that, while she was behind, it was within acceptable limits and they felt she'd catch up. We were definitely more concerned than they were.
And thanks for your congratulations, although I'd have to say my daughter really did do most of the work. I'm in awe of what she's achieved. She fried my brain when she showed me her Masters research.
If I say 'I am going to do something', both to and do should be pronounced the same.
Danny Pike and the horrid dim Sarah Gorrell both use 'ter'...
YesReally? That's quite unusual imo. People would often pronounce "to", as well as other propositions and auxiliary verbs, with what's known as a weak form.
For you, would both dos and the to be pronounced in the same way in the following sentence?
What do you want to do tomorrow?
‘That’s horrid.’If I say 'I am going to do something', both to and do should be pronounced the same.
Danny Pike and the horrid dim Sarah Gorrell both use 'ter'...
‘That’s horrid.’
Horrible, thought Susan. The word is 'horrible’. 'Horrid’ is a childish word selected to impress nearby males with one’s fragility, if I’m any judge. She knew it was unkind and counterproductive of her to think like that. She also knew it was probably an accurate observation, which only made it worse.
Terry Pratchett - Hogfather
I don't think there can be many ways to pronounce 'have' - if you are lazy the second one becomes 'should've' - rhymes with 'shove'.I don't mean to be rude but are you quite sure? I'm trying to read it with each "o" in do and to pronounced as an oo (a long u) and it sounds bizarre
Would you also pronounce both haves the same in this sentence:
I have 2 already but I should have bought another.
I don't think there can be many ways to pronounce 'have' - if you are lazy the second one becomes 'should've' - rhymes with 'shove'.
“We was”, “I were” are equally annoying as is saying “haitch” instead of “aitch”
And of course “there”, “their” and “they’re”
I used to see it all the time in formal reports being prepared for, for example, very senior business people or regulators that had already been reviewed by several members of staff. As soon as I came across any of these I'd stop reading and ping the report back to the author without reading any further. That'll learn 'em.When I used to mark A Level papers, it was staggering to see that there and their were perpetually being muddled ! It was a very frequent error.
When I used to mark A Level papers, it was staggering to see that there and their were perpetually being muddled ! It was a very frequent error.
The head of my team (who generally approves my reports) happens to have really strong views on report writing and clarity. My favourite is when I get a report returned to me with a large section crossed out and the comment "reword" written on it with no context.I used to see it all the time in formal reports being prepared for, for example, very senior business people or regulators that had already been reviewed by several members of staff. As soon as I came across any of these I'd stop reading and ping the report back to the author without reading any further. That'll learn 'em.
Blimey. I'm surprised she even knew 'irrelevant' and 'anaesthetics', let alone misspelt them!Meanwhile, I was teaching a 14 year-old Japanese girl today and she was coming out with things like "irreverent", "aesthetics" and "incongruous juxtaposition"
At "A" level? Blimey!When I used to mark A Level papers, it was staggering to see that there and their were perpetually being muddled ! It was a very frequent error.