I refuse to ever get into this 'England are shit' business though.
They were pretty shit yesterday though.
England aren't shit
defensively we were awful.
I refuse to ever get into this 'England are shit' business though. England aren't shit as you'd know if you watched them over Fabio's reign. They were pretty shit yesterday though. It was just one of those things - defensively we were awful.
Not true... the score was 2-1 at the time so it did prove decisive.... if England had later equalised then it would not have been decisive as the balance would have been tipped anyway.... England were forced to change tactics in the second half to continue chasing the game and therefore left themselves open at the back.
As to a reply ...no... it just isn't practical.... for this game we just have to move on but it's now time for players ,managers and referees alike to start turning on FİFA to change the rules. How can you have fairplay when the game isn't fair?
If Fabio and our gutless FA had anything about them they would have walked off and refused to play until they done something about what was so far the worst decision of this world cup and even now I would back a withdrawl of England from any more Internationals.
yes we played shit but that decision altered the game and who knows we might have gone on to lose 2-6 .but that Ref made sure we would never know and he does have previous ..........there are better Sunday league Refs .................................and maybe players.
it was unfair and thats it.
Glad you cleared that up.
just wondering if anything in the rulebook, about overturning crap referees..?
they do go on about fair play etc..?