conspiracy theory doubters.

[brighton fella]

You see that rectangular thing in front of you ? With lots of square buttons on it ? You use that to put your thoughts down on the screen, in a structured way and without just putting up videos. Nobody is going to watch a 3 hour video.

fella I can do anything what ever way I wish without suggestions coming from smart alecs likes of you. if you don't know how to watch a youtube video for yourself then that's clearly your problem not mine.
whats the whole point anyway its clear to me that you and the rest of the majority on here are not remotely interested.
.even if it was presented to you on a plate you wouldn't believe it. so no f*cking point simple as that..

 

[Megazone]

We are interested, but you've made 42 posts on here and they are all in a similar to fashion to this one - inane rants about how people are ignorant or not interested.

You need to actually present an argument! I'm not sure why you can't grasp this.

why not try by setting an example?

ask a question maybe?

I'll start:

What did you think of the video Brighton fella posted Mustafa?

 

[Hillian1]

what did they see?

Nah, not going down that road with you fella.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

fella I can do anything what ever way I wish without suggestions coming from smart alecs likes of you. if you don't know how to watch a youtube video for yourself then that's clearly your problem not mine.
whats the whole point anyway its clear to me that you and the rest of the majority on here are not remotely interested.
.even if it was presented to you on a plate you wouldn't believe it. so no f*cking point simple as that..

Good grief, we are interested, that's why so many of us have asked for YOUR point of view and all we get is you ducking and diving the question. I do know how to watch a Youtube video, of course I do, but I'm certainly not going to watch at work and when I get home tonight I have better things to do. That is why you've been asked to present your argument, not somebody elses via an overly long Youtube video, yours. You clearly wanted the debate but clearly are not prepared to participate.

If you actually presented a decent argument it might persuade me to invest the time to watch the video. Being commanded to watch it ( of course after finding it because you were unable to work out how to post a link ) and being told I'm a closed minded idiot if I don't isn't going to encourage me to watch it is it ?

 

[dingodan]

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

Ephesians 6:12

 

[Megazone]

Nah, not going down that road with you fella.

you asked me whether i thought your mate and your client were liars.

I asked you what they saw and the above is your response!?

A lot of New Yorkers claim to have never saw the plane, I was just interested to know if your friends had seen the planes or just the building collapse?

The more witness accounts you hear, the more you can determine your own accurate conclusion. I wont ridicule anyone who claims to of seen 2 planes, and I wont ridicule anyone who claims not to have seen them at all.

It's best to think for yourself.

So, what did they see? I'm interested as I wasn't personally there to see it for my own eyes. I'm intrigued.

 

[brighton fella]

We are interested, but you've made 42 posts on here and they are all in a similar to fashion to this one - inane rants about how people are ignorant or not interested.

You need to actually present an argument! I'm not sure why you can't grasp this.

should we not doubt anything that sounds remotely suspicious then and take mainstream media as gospel, walk around blind like a plague of robotic morons, never question anything ?
ive already told you the once watch the old dear because shes holding the evidence right there in her hands, just a load of fabricated nonsense then is it ? not worthy of looking in to. yeh that's it.walk around with our eyes shut...
if you cant be bothered to sit the whole 2 hours then join it near the end then. i cant be no fairer than that .

 

[Brovion]

a lot sharper than you'll ever be sunshine.

How do you know that? You know nothing about me whereas on this thread you've amply demonstrated that you're one of the 'sheeple'; people who can't think for themselves and instead blindly and without verification believe anything they're told so long as it matches their paradigm.

 

[Baldseagull]

Big Mac's and Apple Mac's are evil.

 

[Megazone]

I got about 25 seconds in before I realised it was a waste of time - I skipped ahead an hour or so to confirm it. It was unsourced, uncited and poorly produced (and narrated by a right-wing nut job)

In no way can it be considered evidential of anything. I am trying to persuade him to use more convincing methods to present his argument - because nobody will take that video seriously, and rightly so.

That's fair enough. There's a lot of misinformation out there so people miss the obvious stuff, but there's no harm in having an inquisitive mind. If someone else wants to believes that video, they shouldn't be ridiculed for it, especially now.

Many people were and are getting mocked for the Jill dando conspiracy. We need to learn from our mistakes.

 

[pastafarian]

What did you think of the video Brighton fella posted Mustafa?

he has posted a video?what page is it on?

 

[brighton fella]

Good grief, we are interested, that's why so many of us have asked for YOUR point of view and all we get is you ducking and diving the question. I do know how to watch a Youtube video, of course I do, but I'm certainly not going to watch at work and when I get home tonight I have better things to do. That is why you've been asked to present your argument, not somebody elses via an overly long Youtube video, yours. You clearly wanted the debate but clearly are not prepared to participate.

If you actually presented a decent argument it might persuade me to invest the time to watch the video. Being commanded to watch it ( of course after finding it because you were unable to work out how to post a link ) and being told I'm a closed minded idiot if I don't isn't going to encourage me to watch it is it ?

huck at mr smart alec again.. couldn't resist stating the fact I was unable to work out how to post a link. people like you need bringing down a peg or two... and properly !!.
and I cant be bothered to waste any more of my time with you thank you very much.

 

[Megazone]

he has posted a video?

My apologies.

correction: Pastafarian posted the video.

 

[Fungus]

Before I watch the video, does she say "turn your speakers up real loud, come closer and closer", then fart in your face?

 

[pastafarian]

My apologies.

correction: Pastafarian posted the video.

Thanks,you have however summed up conspiracy theorists in one post.

facts and evidence are really not the strong points of these people

 

[Hillian1]

Just an observation, but I just started that video and noticed that for something so rare and truth giving, why has it only been viewed 93 times?

90 of those probably people on here starting it then stopping it again roughly 20 seconds later.

Surely it would have been watch THOUSANDS of times?

 

[Megazone]

facts and evidence are really not the strong points of these people

So how did the 'CTs' know about the sex scandals of recent way before it came out in the news? how comes the crazy CT's got that right whilst all the really clever, intelligent, open minded people laughed it off as madness?

Do facts and evidence always display the whole truth? Not always going by very recent history.

 

[Fungus]

Just an observation, but I just started that video and noticed that for something so rare and truth giving, why has it only been viewed 93 times?

90 of those probably people on here starting it then stopping it again roughly 20 seconds later.

Surely it would have been watch THOUSANDS of times?

YouTube needs a "Déjà vu" counter, because you just know you've seen it all before...

 

[Westdene Seagull]

huck at mr smart alec again.. couldn't resist stating the fact I was unable to work out how to post a link. people like you need bringing down a peg or two... and properly !!.
and I cant be bothered to waste any more of my time with you thank you very much.

So out of my whole post you could only see that comment ? You might want to get your paranoia dealt with. Oh, I'm so scared - what are you going to do to bring me down a peg or two tough guy ?

 

[Triggaaar]

give me a good enough reason why i should bother. ? its clear that not one person on here takes it serious enough, I bet not one watched the footage presented to them.

Are you referring to the dull 3 hour monologue? Of course no one ****ing watched it, it was dull. I managed 1 or 2 minutes of it, but it was just some old lady talking about her life and her husband.

If there was credible evidence to back up your theory, then of course people would take it seriously, but there isn't.