Conspiracy Theorists

[Megazone]

He needs YouTube video proof, the only proof that is truth!

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk

Hey! Don't forget facebook.

 

[McTavish]

Spelling errors and punctuation you clown, Grow the f*ck up !!! This is encase you hadn't noticed a internet forum not some fu*king audition for some poxy best selling novel.you utter raving tw@t.[/QUOTE]Hmmm...now who was it who mocked someone for the obvious typo of writing "donated" instead of "detonated"?

[QUOTE="brighton fella, post: 8139314, member: 13552"]"Donated" , .[/QUOTE]

"encase"

 

[brighton fella]

If you know that to be the case, I guess it's you.

Still waiting for brighton fella and Wrong direction to answer questions, but it seems they can't.

What questions, If it's S H don't bother, Anyway the threads now drifted on to another far more interesting subject.

 

[BadFish]

You become more annoying with every post you make.

I have no idea who this chippy nicky bloke is but one thing is a certainty... he comes across a lot more brighter and smarter than you that's for sure.

Spelling errors and punctuation you clown, Grow the f*ck up !!! This is encase you hadn't noticed a internet forum not some fu*king audition for some poxy best selling novel.you utter raving tw@t.

You know that you don't audition for novels Don't you? You are thinking of plays I think.

I think you are confused because of the amount of fiction you have been posting of late.

Speaking of fiction - Could you please post your theory of what happened at Sandy Hook instead of further derailing the discussion with deflection, evasion and childish name calling?

Oh and if you could improve your spelling and grammar in order to give your ramblings a veneer of authenticity that would be wonderful. Grammerly is a good free app to start with.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[brighton fella]

Hmmm...now who was it who mocked someone for the obvious typo of writing "donated" instead of "detonated"?



"encase"

"Encased" just for you, God they are getting worse .

 

[brighton fella]

You know that you don't audition for novels Don't you? You are thinking of plays I think.

I think you are confused because of the amount of fiction you have been posting of late.

Speaking of fiction - Could you please post your theory of what happened at Sandy Hook instead of further derailing the discussion with deflection, evasion and childish name calling?

Oh and if you could improve your spelling and grammar in order to give your ramblings a veneer of authenticity that would be wonderful. Grammerly is a good free app to start with.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

4 lines of complete crap, have another go you muppet.

 

[BadFish]

4 lines of complete crap, have another go you muppet.

You must have a very wide computer screen.

Why are you getting abusive? All I want is your version of events from Sandy Hook.

Since I first asked you have: been abusive, been evasive, engaged in name calling, accused everyone of shutting you down and posted an awful lot of nonsense on two different threads.

Why won't you share the fruits of your 'research'?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[brighton fella]

You must have a very wide computer screen.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Hence i can see things a lot clearer than what you can, Try it for yourself It might give you a better insight into how the world is run.

 

[BadFish]

Hence i can see things a lot clearer than what you can, Try it for yourself It might give you a better insight into how the world is run.

Apparently it will also make you unwilling (or unable) to share your insights. Which beyond the primary school playground game of 'I know something you don't know' is a bit pointless really.

Well aside from giving you the attention you crave.

Why are you so afraid of sharing your findings about Sandy Hook? Are they really that bad?


Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[brighton fella]

You must have a very wide computer screen.

Why are you getting abusive? All I want is your version of events from Sandy Hook.

Since I first asked you have: been abusive, been evasive, engaged in name calling, accused everyone of shutting you down and posted an awful lot of nonsense on two different threads.

Why won't you share the fruits of your 'research'?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

You call that abusive, It's called.giving back as good as iv'e got given,, stop getting all over sensitive like a big girl's blouse and tell me your thoughts on 9/11

 

[brighton fella]

Apparently it will also make you unwilling (or unable) to share your insights. Which beyond the primary school playground game of 'I know something you don't know' is a bit pointless really.

Well aside from giving you the attention you crave.

Why are you so afraid of sharing your findings about Sandy Hook? Are they really that bad?


Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

S H is not happening how many more times.

 

[brighton fella]

How about you answering some of the questions put to you, Like why were the security cameras out of use on the day of 9.11 ?

 

[brighton fella]

I am going to bed now, Why don't you do the same. Sleep on it and give me a answer in the morning. Night night.

 

[BadFish]

I am going to bed now, Why don't you do the same. Sleep on it and give me a answer in the morning. Night night.

Excellent deflection from difficult questions.

It's 10.00 am, bit early for bed.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[BadFish]

How about you answering some of the questions put to you, Like why were the security cameras out of use on the day of 9.11 ?

Because the illuminati blew up the twin towers with dynamite and then created holograms of planes to make us think ot was terrorists. It's the only explanation that makes sense. No security cameras have ever not worked anywhere else for any other reason.

I have answered your question now you try.

The Illuminati could have blown up any building in the USA to get their 'attack on American soil'. Why did they choose the twin towers as their target?

The US government could (and did) easily have gone to war on the pretense of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Wouldn't it have been far easier to follow their usual MO and find something similar as their reason to go to war with Afghanistan?

They could have got all they got from 9/11 without blowing up their own offices and departments, so why didn't they choose something else? America has any number of military bases that they could have cleaned out and blown up to exactly the same effect.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[Triggaaar]

What questions, If it's S H don't bother

I posted points you can debate on 9/11 - start at post 15.
And why don't bother with SH? You said you don't think it happened, yet you're unwilling to say any more - that's really weird, why the silence?

 

[LlcoolJ]

S H is not happening how many more times.

Why? And why won't you answer any of the more difficult questions put to you? You're happy to dish out the insults and call people thick/sheep etc but whenever you actually have to quantify your argument, you can't.

Just answer the questions put to you. If you're so sure that you're right then it should be easy. Otherwise, you're just making yourself look extremely stupid.

I've tried being nice in asking you to provide some facts and stuff to back up what you believe, all you did was go on the attack again, misunderstand what I wrote and accuse me of being a snob from Eton.

By the way, just because someone can spell and write a coherent sentence it doesn't mean they went to public school. It just means they had a bit of respect for themselves so thought it might be a good idea to learn their own language.

I'll call this and then I'm out of this bullshit.

I recall on a Brexit themed thread you called me "dangerously thick".

So, I'm therefore within my rights to call you a total ****ing retard who probably has difficulty lacing his shoes. You've declined to say what you do for a living. I guess you clean windows, with your tongue.

You are a moron, you are incredibly stupid. The idea that you think that other people are close minded is massively insulting as you have the intellect of a potato.

I'm bored with pussy footing around on this. There's a reason why most people don't believe the same things as you do. It's because even the average thick person is FAR more intelligent than you.

The stuff you believe in, it's not true. I get that it's made you feel better about yourself but your time would be much better spent doing an online GCSE English course than trying to be David Icke (he's playing a game by the way and has got rich off idiots who believe in nonsense, like you).

You won't give your theory on Sandy Hook because you know it's bullshit. Everything you've said about 9/11 is ancient rubbish that has been discredited. You don't know anything that other people don't. I've read the same things and watched the same videos.

You're not special, you're just wrong.

Tough to accept, I understand but thems the facts bro.

 

[daveinprague]

Why? And why won't you answer any of the more difficult questions put to you? You're happy to dish out the insults and call people thick/sheep etc but whenever you actually have to quantify your argument, you can't.

Just answer the questions put to you. If you're so sure that you're right then it should be easy. Otherwise, you're just making yourself look extremely stupid.

I've tried being nice in asking you to provide some facts and stuff to back up what you believe, all you did was go on the attack again, misunderstand what I wrote and accuse me of being a snob from Eton.

By the way, just because someone can spell and write a coherent sentence it doesn't mean they went to public school. It just means they had a bit of respect for themselves so thought it might be a good idea to learn their own language.

I'll call this and then I'm out of this bullshit.

I recall on a Brexit themed thread you called me "dangerously thick".

So, I'm therefore within my rights to call you a total ****ing retard who probably has difficulty lacing his shoes. You've declined to say what you do for a living. I guess you clean windows, with your tongue.

You are a moron, you are incredibly stupid. The idea that you think that other people are close minded is massively insulting as you have the intellect of a potato.

I'm bored with pussy footing around on this. There's a reason why most people don't believe the same things as you do. It's because even the average thick person is FAR more intelligent than you.

The stuff you believe in, it's not true. I get that it's made you feel better about yourself but your time would be much better spent doing an online GCSE English course than trying to be David Icke (he's playing a game by the way and has got rich off idiots who believe in nonsense, like you).

You won't give your theory on Sandy Hook because you know it's bullshit. Everything you've said about 9/11 is ancient rubbish that has been discredited. You don't know anything that other people don't. I've read the same things and watched the same videos.

You're not special, you're just wrong.

Tough to accept, I understand but thems the facts bro.[/QUOTED

Dont beat around the bush, tell him straight

]

 

[BadFish]

Why? And why won't you answer any of the more difficult questions put to you? You're happy to dish out the insults and call people thick/sheep etc but whenever you actually have to quantify your argument, you can't.

Just answer the questions put to you. If you're so sure that you're right then it should be easy. Otherwise, you're just making yourself look extremely stupid.

I've tried being nice in asking you to provide some facts and stuff to back up what you believe, all you did was go on the attack again, misunderstand what I wrote and accuse me of being a snob from Eton.

By the way, just because someone can spell and write a coherent sentence it doesn't mean they went to public school. It just means they had a bit of respect for themselves so thought it might be a good idea to learn their own language.

I'll call this and then I'm out of this bullshit.

I recall on a Brexit themed thread you called me "dangerously thick".

So, I'm therefore within my rights to call you a total ****ing retard who probably has difficulty lacing his shoes. You've declined to say what you do for a living. I guess you clean windows, with your tongue.

You are a moron, you are incredibly stupid. The idea that you think that other people are close minded is massively insulting as you have the intellect of a potato.

I'm bored with pussy footing around on this. There's a reason why most people don't believe the same things as you do. It's because even the average thick person is FAR more intelligent than you.

The stuff you believe in, it's not true. I get that it's made you feel better about yourself but your time would be much better spent doing an online GCSE English course than trying to be David Icke (he's playing a game by the way and has got rich off idiots who believe in nonsense, like you).

You won't give your theory on Sandy Hook because you know it's bullshit. Everything you've said about 9/11 is ancient rubbish that has been discredited. You don't know anything that other people don't. I've read the same things and watched the same videos.

You're not special, you're just wrong.

Tough to accept, I understand but thems the facts bro.

Brutal, accurate, but brutal.

 

[colinz]

Thousands of eye witnesses and live tv crews watched the jets hit the towers.

Can you post a link to some of the 1,000s of eye witnesses & the live TV crews?

We know that the resulting fires were huge, and burning at a high temperature.
We know that at that temperature steel loses its strength.

Do we, what temperature is this then ?

We can see the towers collapse from the top - the bottom half of the towers stay in place as the tops fall down - the opposite of buildings destroyed with explosives.

http://newsok.com/looking-back-at-the-biltmore-hotel/article/3470180
So this 33-story Hotel was neatly demolished in 1977 - with conventional dynamite explosives. Does anyone still contend that the 110-story WTC towers were IMPOSSIBLE to demolish with the very same / yet much perfected methods in 2001 - twenty-four years later? I sincerely hope we can finally get over this endless and tiresome debate.

When watching (much smaller) buildings brought down by explosives, you can hear huge explosions immediately before the collapse - those explosions are missing from the collapse of all towers in 9/11.

Why compare The WTC Towers to much smaller buildings ? On 9/11 the close up footage of the Towers Collapsing was not shown live in real time. How do you know that the Collapse footage is legitimate ? And not pre recorded.
https://archive.org/details/cnn200109110929-1011
https://archive.org/details/cnn200109111011-1053

To place the explosives in the towers would have taken a lot of time and visible work, which people working there would have noticed. It would also have taken a lot of people who knew they'd be murdering thousands, and they would need to be silenced. That's not realistic.

The Towers stood for around 30 years. Who knows when they were wired for demolition.

Therefore it makes sense that the buildings were destroyed due to the jets crashing into them, and the idea of the buildings being destroyed by explosives is clearly false.

Not if the Towers were not hit by jets crashing into them. Plus even if they were it would take more than 15 odd seconds for the total collapse to happen. Less than one hour after the impact..