B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Whoosh.
Please do elaborate as you've posted so much drivel in this thread it's difficult to discern your oh-so-sophisticated misdirection from your plain stupidity.
Last edited:
Whoosh.
Only where merited.
Not in the case in point, it wasn't.
Please explain.
It was you who made the accusation of disloyalty on people who question the club, therefore it's you that needs to provide the explanation.
Just imagine if your attitude had been prevalent in 1995-97, where would we be then? Thankfully, it wasn't.
People disloyal to the club and TB over Gus deserved the comments from me they received. I, like many others, fought hard for the club's survival so you are, as ever, talking utter nonsense.
Could this thread be a contender for binfest of the year (as well as dumbest opening thread of the year), even though it's only January 6th?
People disloyal to the club and TB over Gus deserved the comments from me they received. I, like many others, fought hard for the club's survival so you are, as ever, talking utter nonsense.
Jesus some of you lot are so precious and as I pay £500 odd plus a year in a small way it is some of my business.
No. They do that if you ask a stupid question. Almost everyone has argued their reason for not sharing the information you want - and you've interpreted their different POV to you as them being tossers.
Maybe you should stop for a second and think about the replies people have taken the time to write. You may end up becoming more informed.
Just as one argument subsides, another one swings into action
I could have sworn it's not only our right to question the club on any given matter - especially the contentious ones - but on a certain level, an obligation to do so. Yet you see it as disloyalty to question the club. Wow.
I think you're confusing "disloyalty" with "disagreeing or questioning a decision." Fair enough, you say you have information, but you refuse to share it. Surely you can understand the position some of us without information take, which is that sacking the manager who led the club to its highest league position in 30 years and was two games away from a place in the Premier League without explanation or reason is to say the least a questionable decision?
I am very grateful to Tony Bloom - without him we'd still be at Withdean, or possibly not there and not in business any more. However, I'm also very grateful to Dick Knight - without him, we wouldn't have a club at all, or at least certainly not one called Brighton & Hove Albion.
Really! So I'm interpreting being asked are the kids back at school today and being called CJTC incorrectly?
No I think I've got it right this bored is infested by smug little tossers. And where did I argue before all the snide little remarks were made? I made a post about what I would like to see/hear from the club.
Jesus there are so many bed wetting little girls that fly off the handle as soon as someone posts something contrary to their own opinion or even worse dares question the club in any shape or form. Stupid this, thunder **** that, blah blah blah
We seem to be more or less in alignment. Just one small thing. If the club sack Gus for gross misconduct perhaps you should have a little more faith that gross misconduct actually occurred.