Just came up on a group chat.weird thread bump
Blimey they didn’t like us back then.
Guilty. Was even more concerned when Potter replaced him. Shows what I know!There were A LOT of our own fans who thought it was a terrible idea getting rid of Hughton.
And a fair few of those fans were on here saying as much.
And there’s nothing wrong with being in that campGuilty. Was even more concerned when Potter replaced him. Shows what I know!
Yes I did, and to a degree still do.There were A LOT of our own fans who thought it was a terrible idea getting rid of Hughton.
And a fair few of those fans were on here saying as much.
All reasonable. I was the other end of the scale. I will always appreciate what Hughton did for us, but sometimes change is necessary to progress and I’d felt it was necessary for a good 6 months by the time it actually happened. I actually felt we showed him too much loyalty.Yes I did, and to a degree still do.
Regardless of how well it has gone, I didn’t like the lack of loyalty to someone who had got us up, kept us up with little budget, and some poor signings (Gross apart).
Arguably, the style of football, yes it was defensive, but necessary given the personnel. How many of Hughton’s offensive players survived after a season of Potter?………Solly? AJ? Propper? The latter two not playing much…..
However, it was the right decision from a business and footballing entertainment standpoint, and in the same way Hughton’s success shouldn’t be for.gotten, neither should the way Potter turned the team around.
Just delighted we’ve reached RdZ.
I think this has always been the case. Going back to the 70s, we had around 14,000 die hards. I would imagine it is around 20,000 now. The rest, which is 8,000 in the Amex, and tens of thousands in the Brighton area, are not all that fussed and like lots of teams.All reasonable. I was the other end of the scale. I will always appreciate what Hughton did for us, but sometimes change is necessary to progress and I’d felt it was necessary for a good 6 months by the time it actually happened. I actually felt we showed him too much loyalty.
He wasn’t improving players, his system was predictable and antiquated in many ways, and the football was atrocious by the end of his era.
I also have issues with the concept of loyalty in football - I’m not sure it exists really, and if it does it tends to be a one way street. It’s even at the stage now where a lot of football fans aren’t loyal to one club. It’s a results based business, and Hughton had stopped delivering anything beyond the bare minimum.
I agree with your ultimate point though - neither Hughton nor Potter should be forgotten for what they achieved with us considering the context of where we were at. Both brought us the best years this club has ever had, until this one of course.
Here’s a more recent one with Chris last week.