- Oct 12, 2022
- 2,684
As they've said themselves: the western definition of human rights is not something they care about. Their choice. Would I want to live there? No. Has their ways worked out for them and the majority of the Chinese people? No doubt.
We talk a lot about human rights in the west, but once again we have very little interest in whether these "human rights" are applied or not. You talk about human rights. I talk about human rights. Our politicians talk about human rights.
But when it comes to action? Do we choose to build affordable housing for every people in our countries or do we prefer to be all cozy with the property owners and construction companies? The latter. We prefer to let people live on the streets above possible decreasing housing prices, because the billionaires would get all sad and shit if that happened. Do we choose to tax the rich and pay the worst paid people enough to get both heat and food on the table every day? We don't. We choose not to tax the rich. We decide to make people suffer from hunger and cold. Do we choose to invest sufficient money in social services, health care and free education or do we choose to invest "sufficient" money in giving the friends, family and neighbours of our politicians fat government contracts? We certainly do not choose the former.
We're very good at talking. There is nothing in our actions as a society that indicates we give two shits about peoples wellbeing. Its just words.
As Peter O’hanraha-hanrahan would say, I don’t like it, but I’ll have to go along with it.