nwgull
Well-known member
,
What's the point in complaining that such a poor quality video can identify her - even if the face wasn't obscured, you'd struggle to recognise her. He must surely be aware that she can be identified by a number of non UK based web sites on which UK law doesnt have jurisdiction?
You are aware that our legal system has a system of appeals because based on your comments above, that would suggest not. Even after appeals fail, you are aware, well you should be if you have been following this case, that even after appeals there is the CCRC?
I would suggest we have one of, if not the, best judicial systems which has been the model for many other countries. That said, it is not perfect hence the various appeals processes available.
With regard to the website being referred to the CPS, wasn't this following a complaint from the girl's father that the video from the hotel foyer could identify the girl! Having seen the video, I struggle to see that is the case as it seems no different to when other parts of the media distort part of an image to prevent identification. Does seem a bit late bearing in mind the site has seemingly been up and running at least since March 2013 although, obviously, it isn't clear when certain items have been added! Will be interesting to see what the CPS think and whether they take it further.
What's the point in complaining that such a poor quality video can identify her - even if the face wasn't obscured, you'd struggle to recognise her. He must surely be aware that she can be identified by a number of non UK based web sites on which UK law doesnt have jurisdiction?