Charlie Hebdo

[daveinplzen]

I find that rather patronising when people have lost their lives. Get a grip.

I find it patronising that there are people that will use it as an attack on an entire religion because of the actions of a minority of fanatics..

 

[daveinplzen]

Hoping it doesn't kick off again everywhere. The usual suspects will support it though

Which usual suspects support acts off terror? Did they support Christchurch? Finsbury Park?

 

[Is it PotG?]

I find it patronising that there are people that will use it as an attack on an entire religion because of the actions of a minority of fanatics..

Whatever Dave, Whatever is said, you'll come up with feeble comeback without condemning such brutality on innocent folk in the name of religion.

You win.

 

[daveinplzen]

Whatever Dave, Whatever is said, you'll come up with feeble comeback without condemning such brutality in the name of religion.

You win.

Nobody on this ;platform supports terror. Plenty use it as a tool to condemn an entire religion. These attacks are awful. Nobody says they are not, but to use them for a poliitical. racist, Islamophobic point on social media platforms is fairly transparent.

 

[Is it PotG?]

Nobody on this ;platform supports terror. Plenty use it as a tool to condemn an entire religion.

Pathetic.

 

[daveinplzen]

Pathetic.

What is pathetic? Who supports Islamic terror attacks on NSC? Were you so outraged by Christchurch? Cologne? Finsbury Park?

 

[symyjym]

What is pathetic? Who supports Islamic terror attacks on NSC? Were you so outraged by Christchurch? Cologne? Finsbury Park?

You and others are apologetics for terror attacks because you love to silence the discussion. People like you only encourage this type of event. This might be because some on here have may more investment in the cult than you are letting on.

 

[symyjym]

[MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION]
[MENTION=41385]Randy McNob[/MENTION]
[MENTION=396]WATFORD zero[/MENTION]
[MENTION=37421]daveinplzen[/MENTION]
[MENTION=35904]A1X[/MENTION]

You lot had better keep a low profile on here today. Disgusting people the lot of you.

I missed out [MENTION=36111]Klaas[/MENTION]

 

[Grombleton]

You and others are apologetics for terror attacks because you love to silence the discussion. People like you only encourage this type of event. This might be because some on here have may more investment in the cult than you are letting on.

Ok, i think you've officially lost the plot here. There is no rational connection between disagreeing with a viewpoint and therefore 'encouraging' it. That's fallacious at best and libelous at worst.

 

[sydney]

throats slit by muslim migrants because Macron refused to condemn those who ridicule Islam ....ding a ****ing ling....goodnight.

 

[symyjym]

Ok, i think you've officially lost the plot here. There is no rational connection between disagreeing with a viewpoint and therefore 'encouraging' it. That's fallacious at best and libelous at worst.

Go **** yourself. Libelous against fictitious names? You really are a prick aren't you.

 

[symyjym]

This will be an interesting live discussion channel today, especially the comments in the chat:

https://youtu.be/HsaQfxb9_xE

 

[Grombleton]

Go **** yourself. Libelous against fictitious names? You really are a prick aren't you.

And you really don't understand the law, do you.

 

[portslade seagull]

Which usual suspects support acts off terror? Did they support Christchurch? Finsbury Park?

It's all over any thread regarding these types of attacks. Apologists who make matters worse.

 

[symyjym]

And you really don't understand the law, do you.

If I have said anything against the Law on this thread, Bozza will be the first to let me know. You disgusting person.

As I said, you lot would have done well to steer clear of this thread today but you just cannot resist.

 

[Grombleton]

If I have said anything against the Law on this thread, Bozza will be the first to let me know. You disgusting person.

As I said, you lot would have done well to steer clear of this thread today but you just cannot resist.

It's not up to you who posts where, so you can lose that attitude you jumped up prick.

You can't claim people are disgusting when you've openly claimed that people on here are encouraging terrorism. You just don't like people disagreeing with you, but that a you problem.

 

[sydney]

****sake ....

 

[symyjym]

It's not up to you who posts where, so you can lose that attitude you jumped up prick.

You can't claim people are disgusting when you've openly claimed that people on here are encouraging terrorism. You just don't like people disagreeing with you, but that a you problem.

Yes I can and yes you are. Yes I disagree when posters are wrong, someone has to, but it is more normal for me to be removed from threads for being honest. Maybe today I will not be removed from the thread.

 

[symyjym]

Two people decapitated ffs

 

[Grombleton]

Yes I can and yes you are. Yes I disagree when posters are wrong, someone has to, but it is more normal for me to be removed from threads for being honest. Maybe today I will not be removed from the thread.

Being 'honest' doesn't always equate to whether something is morally correct or not. Literally nobody on this thread has ever encouraged any act like this. I don't think i've seen it on any thread on this forum and there's been some cluster****s over the years. It's a truly horrible thing to have to witness, whether it be in person or simply reading about it. Discussing things and having a different viewpoint does not mean that people are apologists or are encouraging things - they aren't mutually exclusive.

People have been shot down in this thread for not condemning all followers of a particular faith as the same as those committing the acts. It's a binary, black and white thought process that does way more harm than good.