It's probably the same people who said Upson was 'past it' when he joined us a few seasons back. Quite honestly delusional.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Charlie Adam
- Thread starter glasfryn
- Start date
It's probably the same people who said Upson was 'past it' when he joined us a few seasons back. Quite honestly delusional.
The Sock of Poskett
The best is yet to come (spoiler alert)
- Jun 12, 2009
- 2,836
He's got where he has by being a good footballer. Great delivery on free kicks and corners, creative, can score goals. I'd take him.
T soprano
New member
Charlie Adams is a powerhouse Johnny Dexter type of midfielder, it's a yes from me
samtheseagull
Well-known member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 1,601
Anyone that thinks Charlie Adam is not good enough for us is clueless
Megazone
On his last warning
I think he would be a good addition to the squad,
But who knows? He needs to play for us first.
Not Andy Naylor
Well-known member
Past it, just like that Wayne Bridge was. And Matthew Upson.
samtheseagull
Well-known member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 1,601
Obviously he would need to fit in and some loans dont work. But people dismissing him for not being a good footballer are mad
We dont sign footballers that can take a corner, so not going to happen I am afraid.
Marshy
Well-known member
we bloody well should ! Adam is just the sort of player we need in my opinion.
I agree it wont happen tho
Ecosse Exile
New member
He would be an immense signing, but my understanding is that he's looking for a transfer not a loan.
If it is a loan and Stoke are willing to carry on paying his wages then yeah sign him up, can't see it though, and if its not a loan, I would imagine his wages would make Jordan Rhodes 45k pw look like small change.
If it is a loan and Stoke are willing to carry on paying his wages then yeah sign him up, can't see it though, and if its not a loan, I would imagine his wages would make Jordan Rhodes 45k pw look like small change.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Knockaert.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,075
Yet to see it...
chucky1973
New member
Some people on this board are just deluded, live in compete cloud cuckoo land. Lets get real, we are Brighton, yes we have a fantastic set up, but we are still just little old Brighton, just the 4 years in our entire existence spent in the top league with 13th place our highest ever finish. Yet people still think we should be signing Messy and Ronaldo and nothing less is good enough. If we signed Charlie Adams, it would only be a positive, yes he is probably on the back end of his career, but his experience, his knowledge, his character, his ability would only be a benefit.
Its a yes from me.
Its a yes from me.
Medwayseagull
JCB
Is that Mr Messy written by Roger Hargreaves that you refer to ?
This.
Betfair Bozo
Well-known member
- Jul 24, 2007
- 2,107
He'd be an excellent signing but would be the latest in the long line of players/managers that plenty on here will be unable to ever get his name right. Adam. That's Adam, not Adams. Adam.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,358
Yes from me. He'd be sent off in his first game but He'd Be Back 
Or, on Radio Sussex, Adamson, Allen, Allinson.......
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,358
